Bitget vs MetaMask Comparison
| 0.1 % | Fees | — |
| € 4.00 | Cost for €1,000 | — |
| 1080+ | Cryptos | — |
| SEPA Transfer, Credit Card | Payment Methods | — |
| No MiCA authorisation; CASP application pending with Austria's FMA (as of August 2026) | Regulation | — |
Cost comparison
The basis is a Bitcoin purchase worth €1,000, including all fees and spreads.
| € 4.00 | Cost for €1,000 | — |
| 0.1 % | Fees | — |
| € 7.47 | Wallet transfer | — |
| Yes | Cost transparency | — |
| € 5 | Minimum Amount | — |
| SEPA Transfer, Credit Card | Payment Methods | — |
Pros & Cons
- Over 1080 cryptocurrencies available
- Low spot fees of 0.1% and futures from 0.02%
- Total costs of €4.00 per trade
- Staking is offered
- Wallet transfer possible
- Minimum investment from €5 possible
- No regulation or license available in the EU – headquartered in the Seychelles
- No savings plan available
- User interface with numerous popups and notifications after login occasionally criticized
- Native support for Ethereum and EVM chains, Solana, Bitcoin and Tron
- Multiple network addresses from a single recovery phrase
- Widest compatibility with decentralised applications
- Pairs with hardware wallets
- Phishing detection and transaction warnings
- Significant markup when swapping directly in the wallet
- Cluttered for newcomers given the range of options
- No deposit protection — self-custody rests entirely with the user
- No access to funds without the recovery phrase
Score Comparison
User Experiences
AI AnalysisBitget is frequently praised in user data for its intuitive app, clear design, and ease of use. At the same time, users in the reviews also report criticism regarding fees and support, so the overall picture varies depending on the user experience.
Not enough reviews available.
This analysis is based on 675 user reviews evaluated by AI from the Apple App Store, Trustpilot, and Google Play Store. The total number of reviews on the respective platforms may be higher — the displayed platform ratings (star ratings) refer to all reviews available there. The ratings shown reflect users' experiences and do not represent the website operator's own assessment. All information is provided without guarantee. As of: March 2026. This comparison does not constitute investment advice.
Features
| ✓ | Savings plan | ✓ |
| ✓ | Staking | ✓ |
| ✓ | Wallet transfer | ✓ |
| ✓ | Cost transparency | ✓ |
| ✓ | 2FA security | ✓ |
| ✓ | Whitelist | ✓ |
| ✓ | SEPA transfer | ✓ |
| ✓ | Credit card | ✓ |
| ✓ | Mobile app (iOS/Android) | ✓ |
| ✓ | Web platform | ✓ |
- Over 1080 tradable cryptocurrencies – one of the largest selections
- Spot fees from 0.1% and futures from 0.02% are considered low
- Copy trading and bot trading available
- Total costs of €4.00 per trade
- Most widely used software wallet in Web3
- Native Bitcoin support since December 2025
- One seed across several networks
- Browser extension and mobile app
The five areas head to head
AI AnalysisFees & Costs
Users more often express criticism in the reviews when it comes to fees and costs. Users report that the fees are sometimes perceived as high. As a result, this cost area is described by some users as having room for improvement.
The wallet itself is free; network fees go to the respective blockchain rather than the provider. The cost driver is the built-in services: swapping directly in the wallet carries a noticeable markup above the cost of the same swap through an exchange or aggregator. Frequent swappers should avoid that route. As of August 2026.
Usability & User Experience
Users especially appreciate Bitget's intuitive app and its ease of use in everyday trading. According to reviews, the interface is often described as clear, although some users occasionally perceive it as confusing. The quick verification process and smooth trading workflows are also mentioned positively.
Getting started is straightforward, though the volume of networks, settings and built-in services can overwhelm newcomers. Handling the recovery phrase safely remains central — without it, funds are permanently lost. As of August 2026.
Features & Offering
According to reviews, users particularly praise copy trading, as well as the wide range of promotions and events on the platform. Users report an overall broad offering that can be used well in everyday trading. Occasionally, users would like additional convenience features such as a landscape view on the iPad, the return of certain icons, or more offers for specific regions.
Supported are Ethereum and EVM-compatible networks, Solana, Bitcoin and Tron, with addresses derived from a shared recovery phrase. NFT management, access to decentralised applications, phishing detection, transaction warnings and hardware wallet pairing round this out. Available as a browser extension and mobile app. As of August 2026.
Stability & Security
In terms of stability and reliability, Bitget is repeatedly described by users as reliable. According to reviews, fast trades are also mentioned positively, suggesting mostly smooth everyday use. However, some users occasionally report delayed withdrawals, which means this area is not perceived uniformly.
Not enough reviews available.
Customer Support
The user data paints an overall critical picture of support. Users report room for improvement in response times and occasionally note that replies to inquiries do not arrive or that concerns are only handled with delays. According to reviews, support is also sometimes viewed critically in connection with registration, account matters, and withdrawals.
Not enough reviews available.
Details
| BG Limited | Company | ConsenSys |
| — | Headquarters | US |
| 2018 | Founded | — |
| No MiCA authorisation; CASP application pending with Austria's FMA (as of August 2026) | Regulation | — |
| € 5 | Minimum Amount | — |
| Personal information | KYC | — |
Verdict
In our overall rating Bitget leads with 4.9 against 4.1 for MetaMask.
For most investors Bitget is therefore the better choice.
Bitget is especially valued for its large selection of over 1080 cryptocurrencies and low spot fees starting at 0.1%. In addition, the copy trading and bot trading features are considered a standout offering, which is viewed particularly positively by active traders. Futures fees starting at 0.02% are among the lowest in the comparison.
However, it should be noted that Bitget does not have EU regulation or a BaFin license and is headquartered in the Seychelles. This aspect is seen by security-conscious investors as having room for improvement. The lack of a savings plan and the user interface with numerous popups after login are also occasionally criticized.
Bitget is considered especially suitable for experienced traders who prioritize a large coin selection, copy trading, and low trading fees, and are willing to do without EU regulation.
MetaMask is the entry point to Web3 for many users and by some distance the most widely used software wallet. For a long time it was a pure Ethereum and EVM wallet; that has changed. Solana arrived in 2025, native Bitcoin support followed in December 2025 and Tron in January 2026. Separate addresses for the different networks are derived from a single recovery phrase, so there is no second seed to manage.
The strength remains connectivity: practically every decentralised application in the EVM world supports MetaMask, and the wallet pairs with a hardware wallet so keys never leave the device. Phishing detection and transaction warnings are built in.
The weak point is the cost of the built-in services. Swapping directly inside the wallet carries a markup well above what the same swap costs through an exchange or aggregator. The wallet itself is free — it is the convenience route that gets expensive. As with any self-custody setup, there is no deposit protection and no counterparty to call if the recovery phrase is lost.