Bitget vs Bitpanda Fusion Comparison
| 0.1 % | Fees | 0.25 % |
| € 4.00 | Cost for €1,000 | € 3.00 |
| 1080+ | Cryptos | 100+ |
| SEPA Transfer, Credit Card | Payment Methods | SEPA Instant Transfer, SEPA Transfer, Credit Card, PayPal |
| No MiCA authorisation; CASP application pending with Austria's FMA (as of August 2026) | Regulation | MiCA license via BaFin |
Cost comparison
The basis is a Bitcoin purchase worth €1,000, including all fees and spreads.
| € 4.00 | Cost for €1,000 | € 3.00 |
| 0.1 % | Fees | 0.25 % |
| € 7.47 | Wallet transfer | € 2.91 |
| Yes | Cost transparency | Yes |
| € 5 | Minimum Amount | € 1 |
| SEPA Transfer, Credit Card | Payment Methods | SEPA Instant Transfer, SEPA Transfer, Credit Card, PayPal |
On a €1,000 purchase you pay €1.00 less at Bitpanda Fusion.
Pros & Cons
- Over 1080 cryptocurrencies available
- Low spot fees of 0.1% and futures from 0.02%
- Total costs of €4.00 per trade
- Staking is offered
- Wallet transfer possible
- Minimum investment from €5 possible
- Not available in Germany or France. Both countries appear in Bitget's own terms of use among the restricted jurisdictions: German users have been unable to open accounts since 16 January 2026, and in France all services ended on 31 March 2026.
- Only nine of the 1,230 coins trade directly against the euro. Everything else requires a detour through another currency.
- No granted MiCA authorisation; the CASP application is pending with Austria's FMA
- No savings plan available
- User interface with numerous popups and notifications after login
- Volume-based maker/taker fees from 0.25% down to 0.02%
- Pro order types: limit, stop-limit, stop-market, take-profit, OCO
- Native TradingView charts with advanced indicators
- Public REST and WebSocket API for algorithmic trading
- Shared account with standard Bitpanda -- no extra onboarding
- Liquidity from 12+ aggregated order books
- Learning curve compared to the standard Bitpanda app has room for improvement
- Savings plan feature not available on Fusion
- Lowest fee tiers only reachable from high 30-day volume onward
- Asset selection limited to spot pairs -- no precious metals or stocks like on standard Bitpanda
User Experiences
AI AnalysisBitget is frequently praised in user data for its intuitive app, clear design, and ease of use. At the same time, users in the reviews also report criticism regarding fees and support, so the overall picture varies depending on the user experience.
No separate analysis -- based on Bitpanda.
This analysis is based on 675 user reviews evaluated by AI from the Apple App Store, Trustpilot, and Google Play Store. The total number of reviews on the respective platforms may be higher — the displayed platform ratings (star ratings) refer to all reviews available there. The ratings shown reflect users' experiences and do not represent the website operator's own assessment. All information is provided without guarantee. As of: March 2026. This comparison does not constitute investment advice.
Features
| ✓ | Savings plan | ✓ |
| ✓ | Staking | ✓ |
| ✓ | Wallet transfer | ✓ |
| ✓ | Cost transparency | ✓ |
| ✓ | 2FA security | ✓ |
| ✓ | Whitelist | ✓ |
| ✓ | SEPA transfer | ✓ |
| ✓ | Credit card | ✓ |
| ✓ | Mobile app (iOS/Android) | ✓ |
| ✓ | Web platform | ✓ |
| ✓ | Maker/Taker Model | ✓ |
| ✓ | Order Types | ✓ |
| ✓ | API | ✓ |
| ✓ | Charts | ✓ |
| ✓ | Aggregated Order Books | ✓ |
| ✓ | Savings Plan | ✓ |
| ✓ | Wallet Transfer | ✓ |
| ✓ | 2FA Security | ✓ |
| ✓ | BaFin License | ✓ |
| ✓ | Mobile App | ✓ |
- Over 1080 tradable cryptocurrencies – one of the largest selections
- Spot fees from 0.1% and futures from 0.02% are considered low
- Copy trading and bot trading available
- Total costs of €4.00 per trade
- 7-tier maker/taker model from 0.25% down to 0.02%
- Native TradingView charts and pro order types
- Public REST and WebSocket API
- BaFin licensing via the Bitpanda ecosystem
The five areas head to head
AI AnalysisFees & Costs
Users more often express criticism in the reviews when it comes to fees and costs. Users report that the fees are sometimes perceived as high. As a result, this cost area is described by some users as having room for improvement.
No separate analysis -- based on Bitpanda.
Usability & User Experience
Users especially appreciate Bitget's intuitive app and its ease of use in everyday trading. According to reviews, the interface is often described as clear, although some users occasionally perceive it as confusing. The quick verification process and smooth trading workflows are also mentioned positively.
No separate analysis -- based on Bitpanda.
Features & Offering
According to reviews, users particularly praise copy trading, as well as the wide range of promotions and events on the platform. Users report an overall broad offering that can be used well in everyday trading. Occasionally, users would like additional convenience features such as a landscape view on the iPad, the return of certain icons, or more offers for specific regions.
No separate analysis -- based on Bitpanda.
Stability & Security
In terms of stability and reliability, Bitget is repeatedly described by users as reliable. According to reviews, fast trades are also mentioned positively, suggesting mostly smooth everyday use. However, some users occasionally report delayed withdrawals, which means this area is not perceived uniformly.
No separate analysis -- based on Bitpanda.
Customer Support
The user data paints an overall critical picture of support. Users report room for improvement in response times and occasionally note that replies to inquiries do not arrive or that concerns are only handled with delays. According to reviews, support is also sometimes viewed critically in connection with registration, account matters, and withdrawals.
No separate analysis -- based on Bitpanda.
Details
| BG Limited | Company | Bitpanda GmbH |
| 2018 | Founded | 2014 |
| No MiCA authorisation; CASP application pending with Austria's FMA (as of August 2026) | Regulation | MiCA license via BaFin |
| € 5 | Minimum Amount | € 1 |
| Personal information | KYC | eID, Photo ID |
Verdict
In our overall rating Bitget leads with 4.9 against 4.6 for Bitpanda Fusion.
On a €1,000 purchase you pay €1.00 less at Bitpanda Fusion.
For most investors Bitget is therefore the better choice.
Bitget is especially valued for its large selection of over 1080 cryptocurrencies and low spot fees starting at 0.1%. In addition, the copy trading and bot trading features are considered a standout offering, which is viewed particularly positively by active traders. Futures fees starting at 0.02% are among the lowest in the comparison.
However, it should be noted that Bitget does not have EU regulation or a BaFin license and is headquartered in the Seychelles. This aspect is seen by security-conscious investors as having room for improvement. The lack of a savings plan and the user interface with numerous popups after login are also occasionally criticized.
Bitget is considered especially suitable for experienced traders who prioritize a large coin selection, copy trading, and low trading fees, and are willing to do without EU regulation.
Bitpanda Fusion is the pro trading platform within the Bitpanda ecosystem and is aimed at active traders with higher volume. Instead of the flat 0.99% fee on the standard app, a 7-tier volume-based maker/taker model applies here, ranging from 0.25% down to 0.02%. Account, verification, and custody are shared with the regular Bitpanda platform -- no separate onboarding is required.
The trading interface is based on a classic limit order book with native TradingView integration and supports limit, stop-limit, stop-market, take-profit, and OCO orders. According to the provider, liquidity is sourced from more than twelve aggregated order books. A public REST and WebSocket API rounds out the offering for algorithmic trading. The learning curve compared to the standard Bitpanda app is occasionally criticized in user comments, as is the absence of the savings plan feature.
Bitpanda Fusion is considered particularly suitable for traders who value maker/taker conditions, pro order types, and API access. Those who mainly use savings plans, precious metals, or simple direct purchase are better served on the standard platform. This comparison does not constitute investment advice.