Phantom vs Trust Wallet Comparison
Phantom
vs
Trust WalletWinner
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Best user experience in the Solana ecosystem
- Now supports Bitcoin with Native SegWit and Taproot
- Nine networks from one wallet
- Pairs with hardware wallets
- Built-in verification of trusted applications
Cons
- Arbitrum, Optimism, BNB Chain and Avalanche not natively integrated
- Still strongly Solana-oriented
- Markup when swapping in the wallet
- No deposit protection — self-custody rests with the user
Pros
- More than 100 supported networks, including Bitcoin
- Open source code
- Very simple setup with no account
- Biometric unlock and security checks
- Built-in access to decentralised applications
Cons
- Owned by Binance — concentration of exchange and wallet
- Desktop functionality well behind the mobile app
- Support reported to be slow
- No deposit protection — self-custody rests with the user
Score Comparison
4.7Usability4.6
4.1Features4.4
3.8Fees4.0
4.4Stability4.3
3.5Support3.4
Features
- Cleanest interface in this comparison
- Network list grown from five to nine chains
- Bitcoin including Ordinals
- Hardware wallet pairing
- More than 100 networks from one app
- Open source
- Mobile-first design
- No account required
Details
PhantomTrust Wallet
| Phantom Technologies | Company | Binance (acquired 2018) |
| US | Headquarters | Estonia |