MetaMask vs Trust Wallet Comparison
MetaMask
vs
Trust Wallet
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Native support for Ethereum and EVM chains, Solana, Bitcoin and Tron
- Multiple network addresses from a single recovery phrase
- Widest compatibility with decentralised applications
- Pairs with hardware wallets
- Phishing detection and transaction warnings
Cons
- Significant markup when swapping directly in the wallet
- Cluttered for newcomers given the range of options
- No deposit protection — self-custody rests entirely with the user
- No access to funds without the recovery phrase
Pros
- More than 100 supported networks, including Bitcoin
- Open source code
- Very simple setup with no account
- Biometric unlock and security checks
- Built-in access to decentralised applications
Cons
- Owned by Binance — concentration of exchange and wallet
- Desktop functionality well behind the mobile app
- Support reported to be slow
- No deposit protection — self-custody rests with the user
Score Comparison
4.0Usability4.6
4.5Features4.4
3.6Fees4.0
4.4Stability4.3
3.5Support3.4
Features
- Most widely used software wallet in Web3
- Native Bitcoin support since December 2025
- One seed across several networks
- Browser extension and mobile app
- More than 100 networks from one app
- Open source
- Mobile-first design
- No account required
Details
MetaMaskTrust Wallet
| ConsenSys | Company | Binance (acquired 2018) |
| US | Headquarters | Estonia |