MetaMaskWinner
vs
Phantom
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Native support for Ethereum and EVM chains, Solana, Bitcoin and Tron
- Multiple network addresses from a single recovery phrase
- Widest compatibility with decentralised applications
- Pairs with hardware wallets
- Phishing detection and transaction warnings
Cons
- Significant markup when swapping directly in the wallet
- Cluttered for newcomers given the range of options
- No deposit protection — self-custody rests entirely with the user
- No access to funds without the recovery phrase
Pros
- Best user experience in the Solana ecosystem
- Now supports Bitcoin with Native SegWit and Taproot
- Nine networks from one wallet
- Pairs with hardware wallets
- Built-in verification of trusted applications
Cons
- Arbitrum, Optimism, BNB Chain and Avalanche not natively integrated
- Still strongly Solana-oriented
- Markup when swapping in the wallet
- No deposit protection — self-custody rests with the user
Score Comparison
4.0Usability4.7
4.5Features4.1
3.6Fees3.8
4.4Stability4.4
3.5Support3.5
Features
- Most widely used software wallet in Web3
- Native Bitcoin support since December 2025
- One seed across several networks
- Browser extension and mobile app
- Cleanest interface in this comparison
- Network list grown from five to nine chains
- Bitcoin including Ordinals
- Hardware wallet pairing