Ledger Nano X vs Trezor Safe 3 Comparison
| + 60 | Cryptos | + 11 |
Pros & Cons
- Certified secure element (CC EAL5+)
- 5,500+ coins and tokens, NFT support
- Bluetooth plus the Ledger Live app (iOS/Android)
- Staking directly from Ledger Live
- Firmware is closed source
- More expensive than the Nano S Plus at the same security level
- The Ledger Recover controversy cost the brand trust
- Secure element (EAL6+) combined with open source
- Very fair price: around €59
- Shamir backup
- No touchscreen (two-button operation)
- Small display
Score Comparison
User Experiences
AI AnalysisInvesting in crypto assets carries a high level of risk. This is not investment advice. Prices and figures as of July 2026, without guarantee – check current conditions with the manufacturer.
Features
- Best-seller with Bluetooth and mobile support
- Around €149 (as of July 2026)
- Our value pick: around €59 (as of July 2026)
The five areas head to head
AI AnalysisFees & Costs
Price: around €149 (as of July 2026). No recurring costs; sending crypto only incurs the usual network fees.
Price: around €59 (as of July 2026). A Bitcoin-only variant is available. No recurring costs.
Details
| Ledger SAS | Company | Trezor Company s.r.o. |
Verdict
In our overall rating Trezor Safe 3 leads with 4.8 against 4.6 for Ledger Nano X.
For most investors Trezor Safe 3 is therefore the better choice.
If you manage a broad portfolio and want to reach your wallet from your phone, the Nano X remains a first-choice device in 2026. If you have no use for Bluetooth, the cheaper Nano S Plus gives you virtually the same protection for a fraction of the price.
The clear recommendation for cost-conscious open-source fans: modern secure-element protection at a low price. If you want the comfort of a touchscreen, step up to the Safe 5.