Glassnode vs Nansen Comparison

Glassnode
Glassnode
Winner
4.7of 5
Go to Glassnode
vs
Nansen
Nansen
4.1of 5

Pros & Cons

Glassnode
Glassnode
Pros
  • On-chain analysis at entity level rather than raw address statistics
  • Miner data, exchange flows and supply dynamics
  • Full blockchain history in the paid tiers
  • Own chart editor and TradingView integration
  • Research at professional quality
Cons
  • Free tier limited to basic metrics and a very short history
  • No mobile app
  • Technically demanding — metrics require interpretive knowledge
  • Billing in US dollars
Glassnode Reviews
Nansen
Nansen
Pros
  • Millions of labelled wallets as the standout feature
  • Tracking of movements by large market participants
  • Token, NFT and DeFi analysis in one interface
  • Alerts on larger movements
  • Detailed wallet profiles
Cons
  • No permanently free tier
  • Pricing at the upper end of the comparison
  • Address labels are the provider's attributions, not confirmed identities
  • No mobile app
Nansen Reviews

Score Comparison

3.9Usability4.1
4.8Features4.5
3.7Fees3.2
4.5Stability4.3
4.0Support3.9

Features

Glassnode
GlassnodeHighlights
  • Analysis at entity level
  • Full history in the paid tiers
  • TradingView integration
  • Own chart editor
Nansen
NansenHighlights
  • Labelled wallets in the millions
  • Tracking of large capital movements
  • Wallet profiler
  • Real-time notifications

The five areas head to head

AI Analysis

Fees & Costs

Glassnode
Glassnode

A free tier gives access to basic metrics and public dashboards but sharply limits the historical window. Full history, the advanced metrics and API access are reserved for paid tiers, plus an enterprise tier on request. Annual billing lowers the monthly rate. Plan tiers and pricing change several times a year in practice and should be checked directly with the provider before subscribing. As of August 2026.

Nansen
Nansen

There is no permanently free tier; entry runs through demo or trial access. The paid tiers sit at the upper end of this comparison, and API access and custom data feeds are reserved for enterprise plans. Plan tiers and pricing change several times a year in practice and should be checked directly with the provider before subscribing. As of August 2026.

Usability & User Experience

Glassnode
Glassnode

The interface is built for professional use and assumes interpretive knowledge — without background in on-chain metrics much of it stays opaque. There is no mobile app. As of August 2026.

Nansen
Nansen

The dashboard is professionally built and offers numerous specialised views with extensive filters; the range takes some getting used to at first. There is no mobile app. As of August 2026.

Features & Offering

Glassnode
Glassnode

The focus is on-chain indicators: entity analysis, UTXO metrics, miner data, exchange inflows and outflows, profit and loss metrics and supply dynamics, rounded out with derivatives metrics. Custom dashboards can be built in the studio, with data exported by CSV or pulled through the API. As of August 2026.

Nansen
Nansen

The foundation is labelled wallet addresses that attribute transactions to economic actors. On top sit token analysis dashboards, an NFT suite, DeFi insights, a wallet profiler, alerts on larger movements and detection of conspicuously active contracts. As of August 2026.

Details

Verdict

In our overall rating Glassnode leads with 4.7 against 4.1 for Nansen.

For most investors Glassnode is therefore the better choice.

GlassnodeOur Opinion

Glassnode answers questions a price chart cannot. How much Bitcoin sits with long-term holders? Are coins flowing onto exchanges or away from them? What does the profit and loss picture across the market look like? Analysis runs at entity level — addresses are grouped into economic actors, which raises the signal considerably over raw address statistics.

The offering targets advanced users. The free tier is enough to look around but is limited to basic metrics and a very short slice of history — and with on-chain analysis, history is where the value sits. Full data history and API access are reserved for the paid tiers. Plan tiers and pricing change several times a year in practice and should be checked directly with the provider before subscribing.

There is no mobile app: Glassnode is a desk tool. Anyone unable to interpret the metrics cleanly pays for data they will not use, so working through the research material first is worthwhile.

NansenOur Opinion

Nansen's distinguishing feature is labelled wallets. Millions of addresses are attributed to actors — funds, exchanges, protocols, conspicuously successful traders. That turns an anonymous transaction into readable information: not that address 0x… is buying, but what kind of actor is moving.

The remaining features build on that: token analysis, NFT analytics, DeFi insights, alerts on larger movements and a wallet profiler. For users who want to follow capital flows of large addresses, this is the most specialised preparation in the comparison.

Access is the biggest hurdle: there is no permanently free tier, and entry runs through demo or trial access. Plan tiers and pricing change several times a year in practice and should be checked directly with the provider before subscribing. There is also a methodological limitation worth knowing: address labels are the provider's attributions, not confirmed identities — and the fact that a successful address is buying is not a recommendation to act.