Summ
vs
WaltioWinner
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Over 2,900 integrations for exchanges, wallets, and blockchains
- Integrated DeFi, Web3, and NFT tracking
- Support for FIFO, LIFO, HIFO, and ACB as tax methods
- Country-specific tax formats available for over 20 countries
- Developer API for advanced use cases
Cons
- Free plan not available, entry barrier occasionally criticized
- Setup is described as moderately complex, room for improvement for beginners
- Audit support is currently not available
Pros
- More than 700 exchanges, wallets and blockchains supported
- Full DeFi coverage including staking, lending, NFTs and airdrops
- Free plan for portfolio tracking; you pay only for the tax report
- FIFO, LIFO and HIFO available as calculation methods
- Works with tax firms and offers support in the event of an audit
- Guided setup that stays followable for beginners
Cons
- Pronounced French focus – export formats such as form 2086 are of no use elsewhere
- No public API, so you cannot connect your own tools
- The free plan produces a portfolio overview, not a tax report
- Prices reach €999 a year, which gets expensive at high transaction volumes
- Chat support is reserved for paid plans
Features
SummWaltio
| ✓ | DeFi support | ✓ |
| ✓ | Tax advisor export | ✓ |
| ✓ | FIFO method | ✓ |
| ✓ | LIFO method | ✓ |
| ✓ | API access | ✓ |
| ✓ | Mobile app | ✓ |
| ✓ | Free plan | ✓ |
| ✓ | NFT tracking | ✓ |
| ✓ | Staking tracking | ✓ |
| ✓ | Audit support | ✓ |
- Industry-leading with over 2,900 integrations
- Country-specific tax formats for global coverage
- Comprehensive Web3 and DeFi support
- Tiered pricing from 49 to 299 USD/year
- Free entry point covering 50 transactions
- Tax coverage for Germany, France, Belgium, Spain and Italy
- Web application, usable on mobile
- Two-factor authentication to protect your account