Bitget vs Kraken Pro Comparison
| 0.1 % | Fees | 0.4 % |
| € 1.00 | Minimum cost per €1,000 | € 4.00 |
| 1080+ | Cryptos | 629 |
| SEPA Transfer, Credit Card | Payment Methods | SEPA Instant Transfer, SEPA Transfer, PayPal, Credit Card |
| No MiCA authorisation; CASP application pending with Austria's FMA (as of August 2026) | Regulation | - EU: MiCA - USA: CFTC - UK: FCA |
Cost comparison
The basis is a Bitcoin purchase worth €1,000, calculated from the disclosed trading fee. A price markup in the spread is not included, because most providers do not publish it.
| € 1.00 | Minimum cost per €1,000 | € 4.00 |
| 0.1 % | Fees | 0.4 % |
| € 7.47 | Wallet transfer | € 1.49 |
| Yes | Cost transparency | Yes |
| € 5 | Minimum Amount | € 5 |
| SEPA Transfer, Credit Card | Payment Methods | SEPA Instant Transfer, SEPA Transfer, PayPal, Credit Card |
On disclosed fees you pay €3.00 less at Bitget per €1,000 purchase.
Pros & Cons
- Over 1080 cryptocurrencies available
- Low spot fees of 0.1% and futures from 0.02%
- Total costs of €4.00 per trade
- Staking is offered
- Wallet transfer possible
- Minimum investment from €5 possible
- Not available in Germany or France. Both countries appear in Bitget's own terms of use among the restricted jurisdictions: German users have been unable to open accounts since 16 January 2026, and in France all services ended on 31 March 2026.
- Only nine of the 1,230 coins trade directly against the euro. Everything else requires a detour through another currency.
- No granted MiCA authorisation; the CASP application is pending with Austria's FMA
- No savings plan available
- User interface with numerous popups and notifications after login
- Volume-based maker/taker fees from 0.25% / 0.40%
- Pro order types: stop-loss, take-profit, trailing stop, iceberg, OCO
- Margin trading up to 5x (selected pairs up to 10x)
- Full-featured API: REST and WebSocket v2 incl. Level 3 order book
- Shared account with standard Kraken -- no transfer required
- Active in the market since 2011 with unchanged security record
- Learning curve compared to the standard interface has room for improvement
- Margin availability regionally restricted within the EEA
- Futures run on a separate derivatives platform with own onboarding
- Lowest fee tiers only reachable from high 30-day volume onward
User Experiences
AI AnalysisBitget is frequently praised in user data for its intuitive app, clear design, and ease of use. At the same time, users in the reviews also report criticism regarding fees and support, so the overall picture varies depending on the user experience.
No separate analysis -- based on Kraken.
This analysis is based on 675 user reviews evaluated by AI from the Apple App Store, Trustpilot, and Google Play Store. The total number of reviews on the respective platforms may be higher — the displayed platform ratings (star ratings) refer to all reviews available there. The ratings shown reflect users' experiences and do not represent the website operator's own assessment. All information is provided without guarantee. As of: March 2026. This comparison does not constitute investment advice.
Features
| ✓ | Savings plan | ✓ |
| ✓ | Staking | ✓ |
| ✓ | Wallet transfer | ✓ |
| ✓ | Cost transparency | ✓ |
| ✓ | 2FA security | ✓ |
| ✓ | Whitelist | ✓ |
| ✓ | SEPA transfer | ✓ |
| ✓ | Credit card | ✓ |
| ✓ | Mobile app (iOS/Android) | ✓ |
| ✓ | Web platform | ✓ |
| ✓ | Maker/Taker Model | ✓ |
| ✓ | Margin Trading | ✓ |
| ✓ | Futures/Derivatives | ✓ |
| ✓ | Order Types | ✓ |
| ✓ | API | ✓ |
| ✓ | Charts | ✓ |
| ✓ | Mobile App (Pro Mode) | ✓ |
| ✓ | Asset Selection | ✓ |
| ✓ | 2FA Security | ✓ |
| ✓ | Cold Storage | ✓ |
- Over 1080 tradable cryptocurrencies – one of the largest selections
- Spot fees from 0.1% and futures from 0.02% are considered low
- Copy trading and bot trading available
- Total costs of €4.00 per trade
- Volume-based fee model from 0.25% maker / 0.40% taker
- Pro order types including iceberg and OCO bracket
- Margin trading with up to 5x leverage across 150+ markets
- API access for REST and WebSocket v2
The five areas head to head
AI AnalysisFees & Costs
Users more often express criticism in the reviews when it comes to fees and costs. Users report that the fees are sometimes perceived as high. As a result, this cost area is described by some users as having room for improvement.
No separate analysis -- based on Kraken.
Usability & User Experience
Users especially appreciate Bitget's intuitive app and its ease of use in everyday trading. According to reviews, the interface is often described as clear, although some users occasionally perceive it as confusing. The quick verification process and smooth trading workflows are also mentioned positively.
No separate analysis -- based on Kraken.
Features & Offering
According to reviews, users particularly praise copy trading, as well as the wide range of promotions and events on the platform. Users report an overall broad offering that can be used well in everyday trading. Occasionally, users would like additional convenience features such as a landscape view on the iPad, the return of certain icons, or more offers for specific regions.
No separate analysis -- based on Kraken.
Stability & Security
In terms of stability and reliability, Bitget is repeatedly described by users as reliable. According to reviews, fast trades are also mentioned positively, suggesting mostly smooth everyday use. However, some users occasionally report delayed withdrawals, which means this area is not perceived uniformly.
No separate analysis -- based on Kraken.
Customer Support
The user data paints an overall critical picture of support. Users report room for improvement in response times and occasionally note that replies to inquiries do not arrive or that concerns are only handled with delays. According to reviews, support is also sometimes viewed critically in connection with registration, account matters, and withdrawals.
No separate analysis -- based on Kraken.
Details
| BG Limited | Company | Payward Europe Solutions Limited |
| 2018 | Founded | 2011 |
| No MiCA authorisation; CASP application pending with Austria's FMA (as of August 2026) | Regulation | - EU: MiCA - USA: CFTC - UK: FCA |
| € 5 | Minimum Amount | € 5 |
| Personal information | KYC | Photo ID, VideoIdent |
Verdict
In our overall rating Bitget leads with 4.9 against 4.4 for Kraken Pro.
On disclosed fees you pay €3.00 less at Bitget per €1,000 purchase.
For most investors Bitget is therefore the better choice.
Bitget is especially valued for its large selection of over 1080 cryptocurrencies and low spot fees starting at 0.1%. In addition, the copy trading and bot trading features are considered a standout offering, which is viewed particularly positively by active traders. Futures fees starting at 0.02% are among the lowest in the comparison.
However, it should be noted that Bitget does not have EU regulation or a BaFin license and is headquartered in the Seychelles. This aspect is seen by security-conscious investors as having room for improvement. The lack of a savings plan and the user interface with numerous popups after login are also occasionally criticized.
Bitget is considered especially suitable for experienced traders who prioritize a large coin selection, copy trading, and low trading fees, and are willing to do without EU regulation.
Kraken Pro is the separate trading interface from Kraken (pro.kraken.com and Pro mode in the mobile app) and is aimed at active traders. Unlike the standard platform with flat 0.99% fees, the volume-based maker/taker model applies here, starting at 0.25% maker and 0.40% taker, decreasing as 30-day volume rises. Account, verification, and asset balances are shared between both interfaces.
The order set covers market, limit, stop-loss, take-profit, trailing stop, iceberg orders, and bracket/OCO combinations. Margin trading is offered with up to 5x leverage depending on the pair, with selected assets reaching 10x. The availability of margin and derivatives is tied to MiFID II requirements in some EEA countries and is handled via Payward Europe Digital Solutions. Charts, order book, and API access (REST and WebSocket v2) are described in user reviews as sufficient for active strategies; the learning curve compared to the standard interface is occasionally criticized.
Kraken Pro is considered particularly suitable for active traders who value pro order types, lower volume-based fees, and margin features. Those primarily looking for savings plans or simple spot investing will find a more fitting setup on the standard interface. This comparison does not constitute investment advice.