Backpack vs Gains Network Comparison
| 0.02% maker / 0.05% taker | Fees | 0.08% opening / 0.08% closing |
Cost comparison
The basis is a Bitcoin purchase worth €1,000, including all fees and spreads.
| 0.02% maker / 0.05% taker | Fees | 0.08% opening / 0.08% closing |
Pros & Cons
- MiCA authorisation for the European entity, passported across the EU
- Perpetuals for EU clients through an entity under MiFID II supervision
- A named European supervisory counterparty
- Clean, approachable interface
- 200+ markets in the global offering
- EU clients limited to roughly 40 pairs and 10x leverage
- Fees above the fee-free competitors
- Not a pure DEX — execution runs on operator-run order-book infrastructure
- Account with identity verification required
- More than 270 pairs across crypto, forex, commodities and equities
- Forex and commodity trading without a conventional brokerage account
- Collateral in DAI, USDC or WETH
- Available on several chains
- Capital-efficient synthetic model
- Leverage up to 500x on crypto and 1000x on forex — barely manageable for retail traders
- Synthetic model with oracle dependence as a structural risk factor
- The counterparty is the protocol's liquidity vault
- No EU authorisation
Score Comparison
Features
- One of the few perpetual venues with EU authorisation
- MiCA CASP since May 2026
- Perpetuals for EU clients since September 2025
- Solana-native infrastructure
- Widest market list in this comparison
- Forex and commodities tradable on-chain
- Several chains and collateral types
- Synthetic model without custody of underlying assets
The five areas head to head
AI AnalysisFees & Costs
Standard fees are 0.02% for makers and 0.05% for takers, roughly the market average. At high volume, taker fees can be reduced further through limit orders. Against the fee-free competitors in this segment that is the more expensive route — set against a regulated framework. As of August 2026.
Fees apply on opening and closing a position and run to a few tenths of a percent depending on asset class and pair, with holding costs on top. Network fees follow the chain in use and are low on Polygon, Arbitrum and Base. Exact rates vary by market and should be checked in the interface before trading. As of August 2026.
Usability & User Experience
The interface is among the most approachable in the segment and navigable even without long futures experience. Unlike the pure on-chain competitors, an account with identity verification is required. As of August 2026.
The interface is functional but busier than the pure crypto competitors given the market breadth. Anyone unfamiliar with synthetic trading should read up on oracle pricing and vault mechanics first. As of August 2026.
Features & Offering
Globally the offering spans more than 200 markets at up to 50x leverage. EU clients operate under a separate, tighter frame: roughly 40 perpetual pairs and up to 10x leverage, offered through a European entity under MiFID II supervision. Reduce-only orders are available alongside standard order types. As of August 2026.
gTrade tracks more than 270 pairs synthetically — cryptocurrencies alongside forex, commodities, equities and indices. Collateral can be posted in DAI, USDC or WETH. Leverage tiers reach 500x in crypto and 1000x in forex depending on asset class. The protocol runs on Polygon, Arbitrum and Base. As of August 2026.
Details
| Backpack Exchange (Coral) | Company | Gains Network |
| United Arab Emirates | Headquarters | Decentralised, no registered office |
Verdict
In our overall rating Gains Network leads with 3.6 against 2.9 for Backpack.
Neither provider reaches 4.0 out of 5 in our rating, so we do not give an unreserved recommendation here.
Backpack sits apart in this comparison because the question is not whether you accept a regulatory gap. Its European entity obtained a MiCA CASP licence and a payment institution licence from the Latvian central bank in May 2026, both passported across the EU and EEA. Perpetuals themselves fall outside MiCA — a separate European entity under MiFID II supervision covers them.
The price of that protection is a much tighter frame: EU clients trade roughly 40 pairs at up to 10x leverage, against up to 50x globally. Fees of 0.02% maker and 0.05% taker sit around the market average and above the fee-free competitors.
For EU-based traders this is a different proposition from the rest of the field: less leverage, fewer markets, higher fees — but a regulated framework and a named supervisory counterparty. For anyone unwilling to trade perpetuals entirely outside European supervision, it is one of the few available routes.
Gains Network runs gTrade, a platform that stands well apart from pure crypto perpetuals. Trading is synthetic: no underlying assets are custodied, only price differences are tracked. That allows a market breadth unmatched in this comparison — more than 270 pairs across crypto, forex, commodities and equities.
Leverage tiers are correspondingly extreme: up to 500x in crypto and up to 1000x in forex. Figures at that level are practically unmanageable for retail traders, with liquidation thresholds a fraction of a percent away. Collateral can be posted in DAI, USDC or WETH. The protocol runs on Polygon, Arbitrum and Base, with indices additionally on Solana.
The synthetic model carries a structural risk factor: prices come from oracle feeds and the counterparty is ultimately the protocol's liquidity vault. For users seeking forex or commodity leverage without a brokerage account, gTrade remains one of the few serious on-chain venues. The platform holds no EU authorisation; perpetuals sit outside MiCA in any case, and tax reporting rests entirely with the user.