Bitpanda Fusion vs finanzen.net ZERO Comparison
| 0.25 % | Fees | 0 % |
| € 3.00 | Cost for €1,000 | € 24.00 |
| 100+ | Cryptos | 33 |
| SEPA Instant Transfer, SEPA Transfer, Credit Card, PayPal | Payment Methods | SEPA Transfer |
| MiCA license via BaFin | Regulation | Crypto custodian Tangany GmbH has a BaFin license. |
Cost comparison
The basis is a Bitcoin purchase worth €1,000, including all fees and spreads.
| € 3.00 | Cost for €1,000 | € 24.00 |
| 0.25 % | Fees | 0 % |
| € 2.91 | Wallet transfer | – |
| Yes | Cost transparency | No |
| € 1 | Minimum Amount | € 0.01 |
| SEPA Instant Transfer, SEPA Transfer, Credit Card, PayPal | Payment Methods | SEPA Transfer |
On a €1,000 purchase you pay €21.00 less at Bitpanda Fusion.
Pros & Cons
- Volume-based maker/taker fees from 0.25% down to 0.02%
- Pro order types: limit, stop-limit, stop-market, take-profit, OCO
- Native TradingView charts with advanced indicators
- Public REST and WebSocket API for algorithmic trading
- Shared account with standard Bitpanda -- no extra onboarding
- Liquidity from 12+ aggregated order books
- Learning curve compared to the standard Bitpanda app has room for improvement
- Savings plan feature not available on Fusion
- Lowest fee tiers only reachable from high 30-day volume onward
- Asset selection limited to spot pairs -- no precious metals or stocks like on standard Bitpanda
- 0 % explicit trading fees – costs arise only through the spread
- 33 cryptocurrencies tradable
- Savings plans already from 0.01 € for crypto and securities
- Staking for crypto ETPs is offered
- Crypto custodian Tangany GmbH with BaFin license
- Dedicated TAN app as a security feature
- Wallet transfer to your own wallets not possible – occasionally criticized by users
- Total costs of 24 EUR per 1,000 EUR trade despite 0 % trading fees due to spreads – cost transparency has room for improvement
- Deposits only by SEPA transfer – additional payment methods have room for improvement
User Experiences
AI AnalysisNo separate analysis -- based on Bitpanda.
According to 167 analyzed user reviews, finanzen.net zero is especially appreciated for its clear and easy-to-understand use. Users frequently report simple operation and in some cases fast processes, while occasionally longer loading times, a frozen app, or difficulties logging in are mentioned.
This analysis is based on 180 user reviews from Google Play Store evaluated by AI. The total number of reviews on the respective platforms may be higher — the platform ratings (star ratings) shown refer to all reviews available there. The ratings presented reflect the experiences of users and do not constitute a separate assessment by the website operator. All information without guarantee. As of March 2026. This comparison does not constitute investment advice.
Features
| ✓ | Maker/Taker Model | ✓ |
| ✓ | Order Types | ✓ |
| ✓ | API | ✓ |
| ✓ | Charts | ✓ |
| ✓ | Aggregated Order Books | ✓ |
| ✓ | Savings Plan | ✓ |
| ✓ | Wallet Transfer | ✓ |
| ✓ | 2FA Security | ✓ |
| ✓ | BaFin License | ✓ |
| ✓ | Mobile App | ✓ |
| ✓ | Savings plan | ✓ |
| ✓ | Staking (via ETPs) | ✓ |
| ✓ | Wallet transfer | ✓ |
| ✓ | Credit card payment | ✓ |
| ✓ | BaFin-regulated custodian | ✓ |
| ✓ | Web platform | ✓ |
| ✓ | Mobile app (iOS/Android) | ✓ |
| ✓ | Stocks & ETFs | ✓ |
| ✓ | Dedicated TAN app | ✓ |
- 7-tier maker/taker model from 0.25% down to 0.02%
- Native TradingView charts and pro order types
- Public REST and WebSocket API
- BaFin licensing via the Bitpanda ecosystem
- No explicit trading fees – only spread-based costs
- Savings plans from 0.01 € for low-threshold investing
- BaFin-licensed crypto custodian Tangany GmbH
- Neobroker with stocks, ETFs and crypto in one app
The five areas head to head
AI AnalysisFees & Costs
No separate analysis -- based on Bitpanda.
When it comes to fees and costs, finanzen.net zero is often described by users as inexpensive. Occasionally, individual costs are perceived as penalty fees. Overall, the feedback mainly relates to the price perception in the reviews.
Usability & User Experience
No separate analysis -- based on Bitpanda.
Users particularly appreciate finanzen.net zero for its clear, self-explanatory, and easy-to-understand design. According to reviews, the app is often described as easy to use, which many users view positively in everyday processes. Occasionally, the usability is described as having room for improvement, for example with many popups, longer loading times, or individual moments in which the app freezes.
Features & Offering
No separate analysis -- based on Bitpanda.
There is only limited feedback from user data overall regarding features and the offering. Users occasionally would like additional tax details when selling, categorization by sectors, personal notes, as well as fewer portfolio statistics and no candlestick charts. Individual users also see room for improvement in the style and design.
Stability & Security
No separate analysis -- based on Bitpanda.
Regarding stability and reliability, users partly report fast execution. At the same time, a frozen app, longer loading times, or an inability to log in are occasionally mentioned. Overall, the reviews mainly allow individual tendencies to be identified.
Customer Support
No separate analysis -- based on Bitpanda.
In support, users occasionally report long or tedious processes when contacting support. A ticket hell is also mentioned in the feedback. Overall, there are fewer statements in this area than regarding usability or costs.
Details
| Bitpanda GmbH | Company | finanzen.net zero GmbH |
| 2014 | Founded | 2021 |
| MiCA license via BaFin | Regulation | Crypto custodian Tangany GmbH has a BaFin license. |
| € 1 | Minimum Amount | € 0.01 |
| eID, Photo ID | KYC | eID, Video-ID, POSTIDENT |
Verdict
In our overall rating Bitpanda Fusion leads with 4.6 against 3.1 for finanzen.net ZERO.
On a €1,000 purchase you pay €21.00 less at Bitpanda Fusion.
For most investors Bitpanda Fusion is therefore the better choice.
Bitpanda Fusion is the pro trading platform within the Bitpanda ecosystem and is aimed at active traders with higher volume. Instead of the flat 0.99% fee on the standard app, a 7-tier volume-based maker/taker model applies here, ranging from 0.25% down to 0.02%. Account, verification, and custody are shared with the regular Bitpanda platform -- no separate onboarding is required.
The trading interface is based on a classic limit order book with native TradingView integration and supports limit, stop-limit, stop-market, take-profit, and OCO orders. According to the provider, liquidity is sourced from more than twelve aggregated order books. A public REST and WebSocket API rounds out the offering for algorithmic trading. The learning curve compared to the standard Bitpanda app is occasionally criticized in user comments, as is the absence of the savings plan feature.
Bitpanda Fusion is considered particularly suitable for traders who value maker/taker conditions, pro order types, and API access. Those who mainly use savings plans, precious metals, or simple direct purchase are better served on the standard platform. This comparison does not constitute investment advice.
finanzen.net ZERO benefits in the DACH region from the strong brand recognition of the financial portal finanzen.net and positions itself as a neobroker without explicit order fees. With 33 tradable cryptocurrencies, the broker offers a comparatively broad coin selection among German neobrokers. Crypto custody is handled by Tangany GmbH, which is licensed by BaFin, and is valued by security-conscious investors.
Particularly noteworthy are the savings plans starting at 0.01 €, which represent the lowest entry amount in the comparison of German brokers. The dedicated TAN app is considered a solid security feature. For investors who want to manage crypto alongside stocks and ETFs on one platform, finanzen.net ZERO is seen as an accessible option.
Despite the advertised 0 % trading fees, spreads lead to total costs of around 24 € per 1,000 € trade, which is considered room for improvement in the broker comparison. A wallet transfer is also not possible, and deposits are limited to SEPA transfers — both are occasionally criticized by users. finanzen.net ZERO is therefore especially suitable for investors who prefer a well-known German brand with BaFin-regulated custody and value particularly low minimum savings plan amounts.