Pros & Cons
- Support for over 300 exchanges, wallets and blockchains is viewed positively
- Tax reports available in 27+ formats, including FIFO, LIFO, HIFO, ACB and AVCO
- Free entry-level use with up to 200 transactions possible
- Full API access for automated data import
- Lifetime license options available alongside annual plans (40 to 700 EUR/year)
- Integrated DeFi, staking, mining and NFT tracking
- Onboarding effort for extensive portfolios occasionally criticized
- User interface for beginners has room for improvement
- Native mobile app has room for improvement; usage currently via web version
- Over 2,900 integrations for exchanges, wallets, and blockchains
- Integrated DeFi, Web3, and NFT tracking
- Support for FIFO, LIFO, HIFO, and ACB as tax methods
- Country-specific tax formats available for over 20 countries
- Developer API for advanced use cases
- Free plan not available, entry barrier occasionally criticized
- Setup is described as moderately complex, room for improvement for beginners
- Audit support is currently not available
Score Comparison
User Experiences
AI AnalysisThe analyzed user data on CoinTracking paints an overall rather positive picture from the users' perspective. Users most often mention the clear layout, the easy operation, and the tax reports. At the same time, users occasionally report criticism regarding the pricing level, language settings, and individual app-related topics.
Not enough reviews available.
This analysis is based on 409 user reviews evaluated by AI from the Apple App Store, Trustpilot, and Google Play Store. The total number of reviews on the respective platforms may be higher — the platform ratings (star ratings) shown refer to all reviews available there. The ratings presented reflect user experiences and do not represent the website operator's own assessment. All information is provided without guarantee. Status: April 2026. This comparison does not constitute investment advice.
Features
| ✓ | DeFi Support | ✓ |
| ✓ | Tax Advisor Export | ✓ |
| ✓ | FIFO Method | ✓ |
| ✓ | LIFO Method | ✓ |
| ✓ | API Access | ✓ |
| ✓ | Mobile App | ✓ |
| ✓ | Free Plan | ✓ |
| ✓ | NFT Tracking | ✓ |
| ✓ | Staking Tracking | ✓ |
| ✓ | Audit Support | ✓ |
| ✓ | DeFi support | ✓ |
| ✓ | Tax advisor export | ✓ |
| ✓ | FIFO method | ✓ |
| ✓ | LIFO method | ✓ |
| ✓ | API access | ✓ |
| ✓ | Mobile app | ✓ |
| ✓ | Free plan | ✓ |
| ✓ | NFT tracking | ✓ |
| ✓ | Staking tracking | ✓ |
| ✓ | Audit support | ✓ |
- More than 100 countries are supported with country-specific tax reports
- Self-hosted option available for maximum data control
- CPA partnerships for professional tax advice
- Comprehensive support for all common tax methods (FIFO, LIFO, HIFO, ACB, AVCO)
- Industry-leading with over 2,900 integrations
- Country-specific tax formats for global coverage
- Comprehensive Web3 and DeFi support
- Tiered pricing from 49 to 299 USD/year
The five areas head to head
AI AnalysisFees & Costs
When it comes to fees and costs, the overall view in the reviews is mixed. Some users appreciate the value for money, while others occasionally consider the price too high. Overall, users report both positive and critical impressions regarding the costs.
The tool is free to use after signup — importing, automatic categorisation, portfolio tracking and DeFi and NFT coverage require no payment. What is chargeable is access to the reports, the tax-loss harvesting tool and priority support. Plans run per tax year: around $49 for 100 transactions, $99 for 1,000, $249 for 10,000 and $499 for up to 100,000. There is no permanently free report. As of August 2026.
Usability & User Experience
According to reviews, CoinTracking is frequently praised for its clear interface and easy operation. Users also report an intuitive app, although usability is occasionally described as confusing. Several users would additionally like a German language option or a more flexible language setting.
Setup is more demanding than at the beginner-oriented competitors — in exchange the tool handles complex transaction histories that others fail on. A suggestion engine categorises ambiguous entries automatically. For simple portfolios the feature set is arguably oversized. As of August 2026.
Features & Offering
Among the most frequently mentioned features in the user data are above all the tax reports, which are highlighted positively by users. In addition, users would like more APIs in the interfaces and, occasionally, a profit display in EUR and Touch ID. Overall, users would still like improvements to certain app features.
With more than 2,900 integrations across exchanges, wallets and blockchains, coverage is the broadest in this comparison — particularly relevant for DeFi, Web3 and NFT activity, where other tools run out of road early. Country-specific tax formats cover several jurisdictions. In October 2025 Crypto Tax Calculator was renamed Summ, marking the shift from a pure tax calculator to a broader digital-asset management platform. As of August 2026.
Stability & Security
Users report a mixed picture regarding stability and reliability. Occasionally, they mention login issues as well as cases in which the app freezes or crashes. Overall, users would like more reliability in this area.
Not enough reviews available.
Customer Support
The support is described mostly positively in the analyzed user reviews. Users report friendly support and in some cases also highlight the service in a positive way. Overall, customer support is perceived rather positively by users.
Not enough reviews available.
Details
Verdict
In our overall rating CoinTracking leads with 4.9 against 2.9 for Summ.
For most investors CoinTracking is therefore the better choice.
CoinTracking is considered one of the longest-established and feature-rich crypto tax tools on the market. With over 300 exchange integrations and 27+ export formats, the platform is especially valued by experienced crypto investors and tax advisors. Support for all common tax methods — including FIFO, LIFO, HIFO, ACB and AVCO — makes CoinTracking particularly relevant for German users, as the FIFO method is considered the standard in Germany. Coverage of more than 100 countries with country-specific tax reports is also viewed positively.
Especially noteworthy is the ability to fully record DeFi, staking, mining, and NFT transactions. The free entry-level option with up to 200 transactions allows users to try the software without obligation at first. In addition, CoinTracking also offers a self-hosted option for maximum data control — an aspect that many users in the crypto space consider important. The price range of 40 to 700 EUR per year as well as lifetime license options provide flexible models for different portfolio sizes.
The user interface is occasionally described by beginners as room for improvement, and the onboarding effort for extensive portfolios should not be underestimated. A native mobile app is currently not available; usage takes place via the web version. Overall, CoinTracking is considered especially suitable for advanced investors and professional users who are looking for a comprehensive tool with maximum flexibility in tax methods and export formats.
Summ (formerly Crypto Tax Calculator) is especially valued for its industry-leading number of over 2,900 integrations. No other platform in this comparison offers such broad coverage of exchanges, wallets, and blockchains. Support for FIFO, LIFO, HIFO, and ACB as tax methods, along with country-specific tax formats for over 20 countries, makes the tool appealing for internationally active crypto investors.
Particularly noteworthy is the comprehensive Web3 and DeFi support, which also fully captures NFT transactions. The developer API enables advanced use cases and integrations into existing workflows. Prices ranging from 49 to 299 USD per year are considered moderate by market standards and offer tiered options for different portfolio sizes.
A free plan is not currently available, which raises the barrier to entry compared with some competitors. Setup is described as moderately complex, and audit support is still unavailable.
In addition, personal communication with the team — particularly interactions with Mathieu M. — raised concerns regarding the company’s level of professionalism and seriousness in handling certain matters. Given past industry scandals where early warning signs were often reflected in communication practices and internal handling of issues, these interactions may be viewed by some users as a potential red flag worth considering during due diligence.