GMX Logo

GMX Reviews

As of: August 2026

Perpetual trading against a liquidity pool rather than an order book — oracle pricing, no conventional slippage, but ongoing funding costs.

4.2of 5
Very Good
Fees0.04% maker / 0.06% taker (V2)
|
2 min read
Share:

GMX Rating

Usability4.3
complicatedeasy
Features4.0
basiccomprehensive
Fees3.8
highlow
Stability4.4
lowhigh
Support3.5
poorgood

Our Opinion

GMX takes a different route from order-book DEXs: trades run against a liquidity pool and prices come from oracle feeds. That has a practical benefit — even larger positions execute without the slippage a thin order book would produce. The counterweight is that liquidity providers carry the risk and are compensated through fees.

In version 2, trading fees run around 0.04% for makers and 0.06% for takers, plus ongoing funding costs on open positions. That makes GMX more expensive than the fee-free order-book competitors, particularly for positions held over longer periods.

The centre of gravity remains Arbitrum, with the protocol also live on Avalanche and further chains. More than 100 perpetual contracts trade at up to 100x leverage. GMX suits traders building larger positions who want to avoid order-book slippage and who price in funding costs. The platform holds no EU authorisation; perpetuals sit outside MiCA in any case, and tax reporting rests entirely with the user.

Pros & Cons

Pros
  • Trading against a liquidity pool — no order-book slippage
  • Oracle-based pricing
  • 100+ perpetual contracts at up to 100x leverage
  • Live on several chains, centred on Arbitrum
  • Long operating history in DeFi
Cons
  • More expensive than fee-free order-book competitors
  • Ongoing funding costs weigh on longer holding periods
  • Dependence on oracle pricing as a structural risk factor
  • No EU authorisation

User Experiences

AI Analysis

Our AI collects and analyzes user reviews of GMX from the web and summarizes the key findings.

The interface is deliberately simple and one of the more approachable entries in the segment — position size, leverage and collateral are set in a few steps. Anyone unfamiliar with the pool model should read up on funding costs and oracle pricing first. As of August 2026.

Editorial assessment based on publicly documented provider information and independent industry sources. As of August 2026. Perpetual contracts are leveraged products carrying a high risk of loss. This comparison is not investment or tax advice. All information without guarantee.

Features

Highlights

  • Pool-based model instead of an order book
  • No conventional slippage
  • Leverage up to 100x
  • Established protocol on Arbitrum

Tradeable Assets

  • 100+ perpetual contracts
  • Collateral in WETH, USDC or GMX
  • Swap function for pool assets

Trading Options

  • Market and limit orders
  • Stop-loss
  • Leverage up to 100x
  • Providing pool liquidity

About GMX

Company
GMX Protocol
Headquarters
Decentralised, no registered office

Similar articles on this topic