GMX vs Paradex Comparison
| 0.04% maker / 0.06% taker (V2) | Fees | 0% for retail; pro/API 0.002% / 0.02% |
Cost comparison
The basis is a Bitcoin purchase worth €1,000, including all fees and spreads.
| 0.04% maker / 0.06% taker (V2) | Fees | 0% for retail; pro/API 0.002% / 0.02% |
Pros & Cons
- Trading against a liquidity pool — no order-book slippage
- Oracle-based pricing
- 100+ perpetual contracts at up to 100x leverage
- Live on several chains, centred on Arbitrum
- Long operating history in DeFi
- More expensive than fee-free order-book competitors
- Ongoing funding costs weigh on longer holding periods
- Dependence on oracle pricing as a structural risk factor
- No EU authorisation
- Fee-free trading for retail across 100+ markets
- Dedicated appchain with CEX-grade execution
- Privacy perpetuals with position data not openly visible
- Self-custody
- Clearly separated fee model for professional and API accounts
- No EU authorisation
- Smaller market selection than the largest competitors
- Support runs through community channels
- Tax reporting rests entirely with the user
Score Comparison
Features
- Pool-based model instead of an order book
- No conventional slippage
- Leverage up to 100x
- Established protocol on Arbitrum
- Fee-free for retail users
- Dedicated Starknet appchain
- Privacy perpetuals
- Own token DIME since March 2026
The five areas head to head
AI AnalysisFees & Costs
In version 2, trading fees run around 0.04% for makers and 0.06% for takers. Ongoing funding costs apply to open positions, plus swap fees when collateral is exchanged. Network fees on Arbitrum sit in the range of a few cents. Anyone holding positions for days should price in funding costs above all. As of August 2026.
Retail accounts trade more than 100 perpetual markets with no maker and no taker fee. Professional accounts and API access pay 0.002% maker and 0.02% taker. No separate per-trade network fee applies on the dedicated appchain. As of August 2026.
Usability & User Experience
The interface is deliberately simple and one of the more approachable entries in the segment — position size, leverage and collateral are set in a few steps. Anyone unfamiliar with the pool model should read up on funding costs and oracle pricing first. As of August 2026.
The interface is clean and built for order-book trading; access is by wallet connection. Working knowledge of margin and funding is assumed. As of August 2026.
Features & Offering
More than 100 perpetual contracts trade against a liquidity pool, with WETH, USDC or GMX serving as collateral. Pricing comes from oracle feeds rather than an order book. Beyond trading, users can supply liquidity; the protocol's fees flow predominantly to those providers. As of August 2026.
The venue offers more than 100 perpetual markets on its own appchain in the Starknet ecosystem. Alongside the usual order types there are reduce-only orders. As a distinguishing feature, positions can be held as privacy perpetuals whose data is not openly visible. An own token, DIME, has existed since March 2026. As of August 2026.
Details
| GMX Protocol | Company | Paradigm / Paradex |
| Decentralised, no registered office | Headquarters | United States |
Verdict
In our overall rating Paradex leads with 4.5 against 4.2 for GMX.
For most investors Paradex is therefore the better choice.
GMX takes a different route from order-book DEXs: trades run against a liquidity pool and prices come from oracle feeds. That has a practical benefit — even larger positions execute without the slippage a thin order book would produce. The counterweight is that liquidity providers carry the risk and are compensated through fees.
In version 2, trading fees run around 0.04% for makers and 0.06% for takers, plus ongoing funding costs on open positions. That makes GMX more expensive than the fee-free order-book competitors, particularly for positions held over longer periods.
The centre of gravity remains Arbitrum, with the protocol also live on Avalanche and further chains. More than 100 perpetual contracts trade at up to 100x leverage. GMX suits traders building larger positions who want to avoid order-book slippage and who price in funding costs. The platform holds no EU authorisation; perpetuals sit outside MiCA in any case, and tax reporting rests entirely with the user.
Paradex comes out of the Paradigm orbit and operates its own appchain in the Starknet ecosystem. The benefit of a dedicated chain shows in execution: latency and throughput sit closer to a centralised exchange than to conventional on-chain trading, while self-custody is preserved.
Retail users trade more than 100 perpetual markets without fees; professional and API accounts pay 0.002% maker and 0.02% taker. In March 2026 the platform added its own token, DIME. Privacy perpetuals let users hold positions whose data is not openly visible.
The platform holds no EU authorisation; perpetuals sit outside MiCA in any case, and tax reporting rests entirely with the user. Paradex is an option for experienced traders looking for execution quality and zero cost who assess the regulatory position with open eyes.