GMX vs Lighter Comparison
| 0.04% maker / 0.06% taker (V2) | Fees | Free for standard accounts; premium 0.004% / 0.028% |
Cost comparison
The basis is a Bitcoin purchase worth €1,000, including all fees and spreads.
| 0.04% maker / 0.06% taker (V2) | Fees | Free for standard accounts; premium 0.004% / 0.028% |
Pros & Cons
- Trading against a liquidity pool — no order-book slippage
- Oracle-based pricing
- 100+ perpetual contracts at up to 100x leverage
- Live on several chains, centred on Arbitrum
- Long operating history in DeFi
- More expensive than fee-free order-book competitors
- Ongoing funding costs weigh on longer holding periods
- Dependence on oracle pricing as a structural risk factor
- No EU authorisation
- Fee-free trading for standard accounts
- Execution and liquidations verifiable via zero-knowledge proofs
- Anchored to Ethereum with an escape hatch if the sequencer misbehaves
- Order types including TWAP and conditional orders
- No KYC
- Pseudonymous team, no publicly stated place of business
- No EU authorisation
- Young platform — mainnet only since October 2025
- Support runs through community channels
Score Comparison
Features
- Pool-based model instead of an order book
- No conventional slippage
- Leverage up to 100x
- Established protocol on Arbitrum
- Fee-free trading for standard accounts
- Application-specific zk-rollup rather than a general-purpose chain
- Cryptographically verifiable matching
- Discount through LIT staking
The five areas head to head
AI AnalysisFees & Costs
In version 2, trading fees run around 0.04% for makers and 0.06% for takers. Ongoing funding costs apply to open positions, plus swap fees when collateral is exchanged. Network fees on Arbitrum sit in the range of a few cents. Anyone holding positions for days should price in funding costs above all. As of August 2026.
Standard accounts trade without fees as both maker and taker. Premium accounts pay 0.004% maker and 0.028% taker, with up to 30% off through LIT staking. Heavily automated strategies may face different terms. No separate per-trade network fee applies inside the rollup. As of August 2026.
Usability & User Experience
The interface is deliberately simple and one of the more approachable entries in the segment — position size, leverage and collateral are set in a few steps. Anyone unfamiliar with the pool model should read up on funding costs and oracle pricing first. As of August 2026.
The interface is built around order-book trading and aimed at users with futures experience. Access is by wallet connection with no registration step. As of August 2026.
Features & Offering
More than 100 perpetual contracts trade against a liquidity pool, with WETH, USDC or GMX serving as collateral. Pricing comes from oracle feeds rather than an order book. Beyond trading, users can supply liquidity; the protocol's fees flow predominantly to those providers. As of August 2026.
More than 120 perpetual markets trade through a central limit order book. Alongside market, limit, stop-loss and take-profit orders there is TWAP execution and conditional orders. Technically decisive is the escape hatch to Ethereum: users can withdraw funds even if the sequencer stops behaving correctly. As of August 2026.
Details
| GMX Protocol | Company | Lighter Labs |
| Decentralised, no registered office | Headquarters | Unknown (Team Pseudonymous) |
Verdict
In our overall rating Lighter leads with 4.9 against 4.2 for GMX.
For most investors Lighter is therefore the better choice.
GMX takes a different route from order-book DEXs: trades run against a liquidity pool and prices come from oracle feeds. That has a practical benefit — even larger positions execute without the slippage a thin order book would produce. The counterweight is that liquidity providers carry the risk and are compensated through fees.
In version 2, trading fees run around 0.04% for makers and 0.06% for takers, plus ongoing funding costs on open positions. That makes GMX more expensive than the fee-free order-book competitors, particularly for positions held over longer periods.
The centre of gravity remains Arbitrum, with the protocol also live on Avalanche and further chains. More than 100 perpetual contracts trade at up to 100x leverage. GMX suits traders building larger positions who want to avoid order-book slippage and who price in funding costs. The platform holds no EU authorisation; perpetuals sit outside MiCA in any case, and tax reporting rests entirely with the user.
Lighter takes a technically distinct route: the exchange runs as an application-specific zk-rollup whose only job is to operate a central limit order book for perpetuals, anchored to Ethereum. Every match, risk check and liquidation is proven with zero-knowledge proofs, so users can verify correctness rather than trust the operator.
On price, Lighter is currently hard to beat: standard accounts trade without trading fees, premium accounts pay 0.004% maker and 0.028% taker, with a further discount through LIT staking. Since mainnet launch in October 2025 the platform has climbed sharply on volume.
The trade-offs are real: the team is pseudonymous and the venue holds no EU authorisation. The platform holds no EU authorisation; perpetuals sit outside MiCA in any case, and tax reporting rests entirely with the user. For traders who want fee-free, verifiable execution and knowingly accept the regulatory uncertainty, this is currently the sharpest value proposition in the segment.