Gains Network vs GMX Comparison
| 0.08% opening / 0.08% closing | Fees | 0.04% maker / 0.06% taker (V2) |
Cost comparison
The basis is a Bitcoin purchase worth €1,000, including all fees and spreads.
| 0.08% opening / 0.08% closing | Fees | 0.04% maker / 0.06% taker (V2) |
Pros & Cons
- More than 270 pairs across crypto, forex, commodities and equities
- Forex and commodity trading without a conventional brokerage account
- Collateral in DAI, USDC or WETH
- Available on several chains
- Capital-efficient synthetic model
- Leverage up to 500x on crypto and 1000x on forex — barely manageable for retail traders
- Synthetic model with oracle dependence as a structural risk factor
- The counterparty is the protocol's liquidity vault
- No EU authorisation
- Trading against a liquidity pool — no order-book slippage
- Oracle-based pricing
- 100+ perpetual contracts at up to 100x leverage
- Live on several chains, centred on Arbitrum
- Long operating history in DeFi
- More expensive than fee-free order-book competitors
- Ongoing funding costs weigh on longer holding periods
- Dependence on oracle pricing as a structural risk factor
- No EU authorisation
Score Comparison
Features
- Widest market list in this comparison
- Forex and commodities tradable on-chain
- Several chains and collateral types
- Synthetic model without custody of underlying assets
- Pool-based model instead of an order book
- No conventional slippage
- Leverage up to 100x
- Established protocol on Arbitrum
The five areas head to head
AI AnalysisFees & Costs
Fees apply on opening and closing a position and run to a few tenths of a percent depending on asset class and pair, with holding costs on top. Network fees follow the chain in use and are low on Polygon, Arbitrum and Base. Exact rates vary by market and should be checked in the interface before trading. As of August 2026.
In version 2, trading fees run around 0.04% for makers and 0.06% for takers. Ongoing funding costs apply to open positions, plus swap fees when collateral is exchanged. Network fees on Arbitrum sit in the range of a few cents. Anyone holding positions for days should price in funding costs above all. As of August 2026.
Usability & User Experience
The interface is functional but busier than the pure crypto competitors given the market breadth. Anyone unfamiliar with synthetic trading should read up on oracle pricing and vault mechanics first. As of August 2026.
The interface is deliberately simple and one of the more approachable entries in the segment — position size, leverage and collateral are set in a few steps. Anyone unfamiliar with the pool model should read up on funding costs and oracle pricing first. As of August 2026.
Features & Offering
gTrade tracks more than 270 pairs synthetically — cryptocurrencies alongside forex, commodities, equities and indices. Collateral can be posted in DAI, USDC or WETH. Leverage tiers reach 500x in crypto and 1000x in forex depending on asset class. The protocol runs on Polygon, Arbitrum and Base. As of August 2026.
More than 100 perpetual contracts trade against a liquidity pool, with WETH, USDC or GMX serving as collateral. Pricing comes from oracle feeds rather than an order book. Beyond trading, users can supply liquidity; the protocol's fees flow predominantly to those providers. As of August 2026.
Details
| Gains Network | Company | GMX Protocol |
| Decentralised, no registered office | Headquarters | Decentralised, no registered office |
Verdict
In our overall rating GMX leads with 4.2 against 3.6 for Gains Network.
For most investors GMX is therefore the better choice.
Gains Network runs gTrade, a platform that stands well apart from pure crypto perpetuals. Trading is synthetic: no underlying assets are custodied, only price differences are tracked. That allows a market breadth unmatched in this comparison — more than 270 pairs across crypto, forex, commodities and equities.
Leverage tiers are correspondingly extreme: up to 500x in crypto and up to 1000x in forex. Figures at that level are practically unmanageable for retail traders, with liquidation thresholds a fraction of a percent away. Collateral can be posted in DAI, USDC or WETH. The protocol runs on Polygon, Arbitrum and Base, with indices additionally on Solana.
The synthetic model carries a structural risk factor: prices come from oracle feeds and the counterparty is ultimately the protocol's liquidity vault. For users seeking forex or commodity leverage without a brokerage account, gTrade remains one of the few serious on-chain venues. The platform holds no EU authorisation; perpetuals sit outside MiCA in any case, and tax reporting rests entirely with the user.
GMX takes a different route from order-book DEXs: trades run against a liquidity pool and prices come from oracle feeds. That has a practical benefit — even larger positions execute without the slippage a thin order book would produce. The counterweight is that liquidity providers carry the risk and are compensated through fees.
In version 2, trading fees run around 0.04% for makers and 0.06% for takers, plus ongoing funding costs on open positions. That makes GMX more expensive than the fee-free order-book competitors, particularly for positions held over longer periods.
The centre of gravity remains Arbitrum, with the protocol also live on Avalanche and further chains. More than 100 perpetual contracts trade at up to 100x leverage. GMX suits traders building larger positions who want to avoid order-book slippage and who price in funding costs. The platform holds no EU authorisation; perpetuals sit outside MiCA in any case, and tax reporting rests entirely with the user.