MetaMask vs Paradex Comparison
| Depends on integrated perp provider (avg 0.02–0.06%) | Fees | 0% for retail; pro/API 0.002% / 0.02% |
MetaMaskWinner
vs
Paradex
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Perpetual trading without leaving the MetaMask wallet
- Execution through the Hyperliquid order book
- Fee openly disclosed, no hidden spread
- One-click funding from various EVM chains
- Self-custody, no KYC
Cons
- 0.1% builder fee on top of the executing order book's own fee
- Trading directly on Hyperliquid is noticeably cheaper
- No EU authorisation
- Blocked in several countries including the US and the UK
Pros
- Fee-free trading for retail across 100+ markets
- Dedicated appchain with CEX-grade execution
- Privacy perpetuals with position data not openly visible
- Self-custody
- Clearly separated fee model for professional and API accounts
Cons
- No EU authorisation
- Smaller market selection than the largest competitors
- Support runs through community channels
- Tax reporting rests entirely with the user
Score Comparison
4.4Usability4.7
4.0Features4.4
3.8Fees4.9
4.5Stability4.3
3.6Support3.6
Features
- Out of beta since April 2026
- One-click funding from any EVM chain
- Transparently disclosed additional fee
- Leverage up to 50x
- Fee-free for retail users
- Dedicated Starknet appchain
- Privacy perpetuals
- Own token DIME since March 2026
Details
MetaMaskParadex
| Consensys + integrated partners | Company | Paradigm / Paradex |
| United States | Headquarters | United States |