Ledger Nano X vs Trezor Model One Comparison
| + 60 | Cryptos | + 8 |
Pros & Cons
- Certified secure element (CC EAL5+)
- 5,500+ coins and tokens, NFT support
- Bluetooth plus the Ledger Live app (iOS/Android)
- Staking directly from Ledger Live
- Firmware is closed source
- More expensive than the Nano S Plus at the same security level
- The Ledger Recover controversy cost the brand trust
- Proven open-source classic, in service since 2014
- Low purchase price
- Simple, robust operation
- No secure element
- Supports fewer coins (no XRP or ADA, among others)
- Small display, no touch input
Score Comparison
User Experiences
AI AnalysisInvesting in crypto assets carries a high level of risk. This is not investment advice. Prices and figures as of July 2026, without guarantee – check current conditions with the manufacturer.
Features
- Best-seller with Bluetooth and mobile support
- Around €149 (as of July 2026)
- The world's first hardware wallet (2014)
- Today we would rather recommend the Trezor Safe 3 or Safe 5
The five areas head to head
AI AnalysisFees & Costs
Price: around €149 (as of July 2026). No recurring costs; sending crypto only incurs the usual network fees.
Price: the cheapest Trezor (as of July 2026 – check the current price with the manufacturer). No recurring costs.
Details
| Ledger SAS | Company | Trezor Company s.r.o. |
Verdict
In our overall rating Ledger Nano X leads with 4.6 against 4.2 for Trezor Model One.
For most investors Ledger Nano X is therefore the better choice.
If you manage a broad portfolio and want to reach your wallet from your phone, the Nano X remains a first-choice device in 2026. If you have no use for Bluetooth, the cheaper Nano S Plus gives you virtually the same protection for a fraction of the price.
The classic still does its job, but it shows its age: no secure element, no touch input, fewer supported coins. For newcomers we would point to the Trezor Safe 3 or Safe 5; the Model One remains a cheap secondary wallet.