Jupiter vs MetaMask Comparison
| 4-7 bps position open/close | Fees | Depends on integrated perp provider (avg 0.02–0.06%) |
Jupiter
vs
MetaMaskWinner
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Near-zero network fees on Solana
- Very fast execution
- Embedded in Solana's largest trading ecosystem
- Pool model without order-book slippage
- Liquidity provision through JLP with a share of fees
Cons
- Narrow market list — essentially the major pairs
- Funding costs on open positions
- Very high leverage tiers on individual pairs raise liquidation risk
- No EU authorisation
Pros
- Perpetual trading without leaving the MetaMask wallet
- Execution through the Hyperliquid order book
- Fee openly disclosed, no hidden spread
- One-click funding from various EVM chains
- Self-custody, no KYC
Cons
- 0.1% builder fee on top of the executing order book's own fee
- Trading directly on Hyperliquid is noticeably cheaper
- No EU authorisation
- Blocked in several countries including the US and the UK
Score Comparison
4.6Usability4.4
3.9Features4.0
4.0Fees3.8
4.3Stability4.5
3.5Support3.6
Features
- Network fees at a fraction of a cent
- JLP pool at billion-dollar scale
- Part of the Solana trading ecosystem
- Fee share for liquidity providers
- Out of beta since April 2026
- One-click funding from any EVM chain
- Transparently disclosed additional fee
- Leverage up to 50x
Details
JupiterMetaMask
| Jupiter Exchange | Company | Consensys + integrated partners |
| Singapore | Headquarters | United States |