Hyperliquid vs MetaMask Comparison
| 0.015% maker / 0.045% taker | Fees | Depends on integrated perp provider (avg 0.02–0.06%) |
Hyperliquid
vs
MetaMask
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Order book held fully on-chain on a purpose-built layer 1
- CEX-level fees from 0.015% maker / 0.045% taker
- No network fees on trades
- 170+ perpetual markets with order types including TWAP
- Self-custody, no mandatory KYC
Cons
- No EU authorisation and no regulated counterparty
- Support runs through community channels only
- Leverage is capped tightly on smaller markets — headline figures apply to major markets only
- Tax reporting rests entirely with the user
Pros
- Perpetual trading without leaving the MetaMask wallet
- Execution through the Hyperliquid order book
- Fee openly disclosed, no hidden spread
- One-click funding from various EVM chains
- Self-custody, no KYC
Cons
- 0.1% builder fee on top of the executing order book's own fee
- Trading directly on Hyperliquid is noticeably cheaper
- No EU authorisation
- Blocked in several countries including the US and the UK
Score Comparison
4.8Usability4.4
4.8Features4.0
4.7Fees3.8
4.6Stability4.5
3.8Support3.6
Features
- Largest perpetual DEX by trading volume
- Purpose-built layer 1 rather than a rollup dependency
- Fee discount through HYPE staking
- TWAP orders available to retail users
- Out of beta since April 2026
- One-click funding from any EVM chain
- Transparently disclosed additional fee
- Leverage up to 50x
Details
HyperliquidMetaMask
| Hyperliquid Labs | Company | Consensys + integrated partners |
| United States | Headquarters | United States |