Gains Network vs Jupiter Comparison
| 0.08% opening / 0.08% closing | Fees | 4-7 bps position open/close |
Gains Network
vs
JupiterWinner
Pros & Cons
Pros
- More than 270 pairs across crypto, forex, commodities and equities
- Forex and commodity trading without a conventional brokerage account
- Collateral in DAI, USDC or WETH
- Available on several chains
- Capital-efficient synthetic model
Cons
- Leverage up to 500x on crypto and 1000x on forex — barely manageable for retail traders
- Synthetic model with oracle dependence as a structural risk factor
- The counterparty is the protocol's liquidity vault
- No EU authorisation
Pros
- Near-zero network fees on Solana
- Very fast execution
- Embedded in Solana's largest trading ecosystem
- Pool model without order-book slippage
- Liquidity provision through JLP with a share of fees
Cons
- Narrow market list — essentially the major pairs
- Funding costs on open positions
- Very high leverage tiers on individual pairs raise liquidation risk
- No EU authorisation
Score Comparison
3.9Usability4.6
4.4Features3.9
3.9Fees4.0
4.0Stability4.3
3.4Support3.5
Features
- Widest market list in this comparison
- Forex and commodities tradable on-chain
- Several chains and collateral types
- Synthetic model without custody of underlying assets
- Network fees at a fraction of a cent
- JLP pool at billion-dollar scale
- Part of the Solana trading ecosystem
- Fee share for liquidity providers
Details
Gains NetworkJupiter
| Gains Network | Company | Jupiter Exchange |
| Decentralised, no registered office | Headquarters | Singapore |