Extended vs MetaMask Comparison
| 0% maker / 0.025% taker | Fees | Depends on integrated perp provider (avg 0.02–0.06%) |
Extended
vs
MetaMaskWinner
Pros & Cons
Pros
- 0% maker fee, 0.025% taker
- Daily maker rebates based on maker share
- Very low network fees on Starknet
- Unified margin across several asset classes
- Self-custody
Cons
- Considerably smaller than the market leaders
- Around 50 trading pairs — a narrower list than competitors
- No EU authorisation
- Support runs through community channels
Pros
- Perpetual trading without leaving the MetaMask wallet
- Execution through the Hyperliquid order book
- Fee openly disclosed, no hidden spread
- One-click funding from various EVM chains
- Self-custody, no KYC
Cons
- 0.1% builder fee on top of the executing order book's own fee
- Trading directly on Hyperliquid is noticeably cheaper
- No EU authorisation
- Blocked in several countries including the US and the UK
Score Comparison
4.3Usability4.4
4.3Features4.0
4.8Fees3.8
4.2Stability4.5
3.7Support3.6
Features
- Fee-free on the maker side
- Team with Revolut roots
- Cross-asset collateral and unified margin
- Network costs in the cents range
- Out of beta since April 2026
- One-click funding from any EVM chain
- Transparently disclosed additional fee
- Leverage up to 50x
Details
ExtendedMetaMask
| Extended Finance | Company | Consensys + integrated partners |
| Unknown (Decentralised team) | Headquarters | United States |