Extended vs Lighter Comparison
| 0% maker / 0.025% taker | Fees | Free for standard accounts; premium 0.004% / 0.028% |
Extended
vs
LighterWinner
Pros & Cons
Pros
- 0% maker fee, 0.025% taker
- Daily maker rebates based on maker share
- Very low network fees on Starknet
- Unified margin across several asset classes
- Self-custody
Cons
- Considerably smaller than the market leaders
- Around 50 trading pairs — a narrower list than competitors
- No EU authorisation
- Support runs through community channels
Pros
- Fee-free trading for standard accounts
- Execution and liquidations verifiable via zero-knowledge proofs
- Anchored to Ethereum with an escape hatch if the sequencer misbehaves
- Order types including TWAP and conditional orders
- No KYC
Cons
- Pseudonymous team, no publicly stated place of business
- No EU authorisation
- Young platform — mainnet only since October 2025
- Support runs through community channels
Score Comparison
4.3Usability4.6
4.3Features4.6
4.8Fees5.0
4.2Stability4.4
3.7Support3.5
Features
- Fee-free on the maker side
- Team with Revolut roots
- Cross-asset collateral and unified margin
- Network costs in the cents range
- Fee-free trading for standard accounts
- Application-specific zk-rollup rather than a general-purpose chain
- Cryptographically verifiable matching
- Discount through LIT staking
Details
ExtendedLighter
| Extended Finance | Company | Lighter Labs |
| Unknown (Decentralised team) | Headquarters | Unknown (Team Pseudonymous) |