Extended vs Jupiter Comparison
| 0% maker / 0.025% taker | Fees | 4-7 bps position open/close |
ExtendedWinner
vs
Jupiter
Pros & Cons
Pros
- 0% maker fee, 0.025% taker
- Daily maker rebates based on maker share
- Very low network fees on Starknet
- Unified margin across several asset classes
- Self-custody
Cons
- Considerably smaller than the market leaders
- Around 50 trading pairs — a narrower list than competitors
- No EU authorisation
- Support runs through community channels
Pros
- Near-zero network fees on Solana
- Very fast execution
- Embedded in Solana's largest trading ecosystem
- Pool model without order-book slippage
- Liquidity provision through JLP with a share of fees
Cons
- Narrow market list — essentially the major pairs
- Funding costs on open positions
- Very high leverage tiers on individual pairs raise liquidation risk
- No EU authorisation
Score Comparison
4.3Usability4.6
4.3Features3.9
4.8Fees4.0
4.2Stability4.3
3.7Support3.5
Features
- Fee-free on the maker side
- Team with Revolut roots
- Cross-asset collateral and unified margin
- Network costs in the cents range
- Network fees at a fraction of a cent
- JLP pool at billion-dollar scale
- Part of the Solana trading ecosystem
- Fee share for liquidity providers
Details
ExtendedJupiter
| Extended Finance | Company | Jupiter Exchange |
| Unknown (Decentralised team) | Headquarters | Singapore |