Extended vs Hyperliquid Comparison
| 0% maker / 0.025% taker | Fees | 0.015% maker / 0.045% taker |
Extended
vs
HyperliquidWinner
Pros & Cons
Pros
- 0% maker fee, 0.025% taker
- Daily maker rebates based on maker share
- Very low network fees on Starknet
- Unified margin across several asset classes
- Self-custody
Cons
- Considerably smaller than the market leaders
- Around 50 trading pairs — a narrower list than competitors
- No EU authorisation
- Support runs through community channels
Pros
- Order book held fully on-chain on a purpose-built layer 1
- CEX-level fees from 0.015% maker / 0.045% taker
- No network fees on trades
- 170+ perpetual markets with order types including TWAP
- Self-custody, no mandatory KYC
Cons
- No EU authorisation and no regulated counterparty
- Support runs through community channels only
- Leverage is capped tightly on smaller markets — headline figures apply to major markets only
- Tax reporting rests entirely with the user
Score Comparison
4.3Usability4.8
4.3Features4.8
4.8Fees4.7
4.2Stability4.6
3.7Support3.8
Features
- Fee-free on the maker side
- Team with Revolut roots
- Cross-asset collateral and unified margin
- Network costs in the cents range
- Largest perpetual DEX by trading volume
- Purpose-built layer 1 rather than a rollup dependency
- Fee discount through HYPE staking
- TWAP orders available to retail users
Details
ExtendedHyperliquid
| Extended Finance | Company | Hyperliquid Labs |
| Unknown (Decentralised team) | Headquarters | United States |