Aster vs MetaMask Comparison
| 0% maker / 0.04% taker (USDT perps) | Fees | Depends on integrated perp provider (avg 0.02–0.06%) |
Aster
vs
MetaMask
Pros & Cons
Pros
- 0% maker fee on perpetuals
- Four chains — BNB Chain, Ethereum, Solana and Arbitrum — from one interface
- Collateral can keep earning yield while positions stay open
- Non-custodial with on-chain settlement
- No KYC for on-chain trading
Cons
- No EU authorisation
- 1001x leverage marketing sets an unrealistic anchor
- Liquidity thinner than the volume leaders in smaller markets
- Tax reporting rests entirely with the user
Pros
- Perpetual trading without leaving the MetaMask wallet
- Execution through the Hyperliquid order book
- Fee openly disclosed, no hidden spread
- One-click funding from various EVM chains
- Self-custody, no KYC
Cons
- 0.1% builder fee on top of the executing order book's own fee
- Trading directly on Hyperliquid is noticeably cheaper
- No EU authorisation
- Blocked in several countries including the US and the UK
Score Comparison
4.6Usability4.4
4.7Features4.0
4.8Fees3.8
4.3Stability4.5
3.6Support3.6
Features
- Maker fee at 0% since February 2026
- Four chains in one trading interface
- Yield-bearing collateral
- CEX-grade order-book experience
- Out of beta since April 2026
- One-click funding from any EVM chain
- Transparently disclosed additional fee
- Leverage up to 50x
Details
AsterMetaMask
| Aster (merger of Astherus & APX Finance) | Company | Consensys + integrated partners |
| Seychelles | Headquarters | United States |