Aster vs Jupiter Comparison
| 0% maker / 0.04% taker (USDT perps) | Fees | 4-7 bps position open/close |
AsterWinner
vs
Jupiter
Pros & Cons
Pros
- 0% maker fee on perpetuals
- Four chains — BNB Chain, Ethereum, Solana and Arbitrum — from one interface
- Collateral can keep earning yield while positions stay open
- Non-custodial with on-chain settlement
- No KYC for on-chain trading
Cons
- No EU authorisation
- 1001x leverage marketing sets an unrealistic anchor
- Liquidity thinner than the volume leaders in smaller markets
- Tax reporting rests entirely with the user
Pros
- Near-zero network fees on Solana
- Very fast execution
- Embedded in Solana's largest trading ecosystem
- Pool model without order-book slippage
- Liquidity provision through JLP with a share of fees
Cons
- Narrow market list — essentially the major pairs
- Funding costs on open positions
- Very high leverage tiers on individual pairs raise liquidation risk
- No EU authorisation
Score Comparison
4.6Usability4.6
4.7Features3.9
4.8Fees4.0
4.3Stability4.3
3.6Support3.5
Features
- Maker fee at 0% since February 2026
- Four chains in one trading interface
- Yield-bearing collateral
- CEX-grade order-book experience
- Network fees at a fraction of a cent
- JLP pool at billion-dollar scale
- Part of the Solana trading ecosystem
- Fee share for liquidity providers
Details
AsterJupiter
| Aster (merger of Astherus & APX Finance) | Company | Jupiter Exchange |
| Seychelles | Headquarters | Singapore |