Aster vs Hyperliquid Comparison
| 0% maker / 0.04% taker (USDT perps) | Fees | 0.015% maker / 0.045% taker |
Aster
vs
Hyperliquid
Pros & Cons
Pros
- 0% maker fee on perpetuals
- Four chains — BNB Chain, Ethereum, Solana and Arbitrum — from one interface
- Collateral can keep earning yield while positions stay open
- Non-custodial with on-chain settlement
- No KYC for on-chain trading
Cons
- No EU authorisation
- 1001x leverage marketing sets an unrealistic anchor
- Liquidity thinner than the volume leaders in smaller markets
- Tax reporting rests entirely with the user
Pros
- Order book held fully on-chain on a purpose-built layer 1
- CEX-level fees from 0.015% maker / 0.045% taker
- No network fees on trades
- 170+ perpetual markets with order types including TWAP
- Self-custody, no mandatory KYC
Cons
- No EU authorisation and no regulated counterparty
- Support runs through community channels only
- Leverage is capped tightly on smaller markets — headline figures apply to major markets only
- Tax reporting rests entirely with the user
Score Comparison
4.6Usability4.8
4.7Features4.8
4.8Fees4.7
4.3Stability4.6
3.6Support3.8
Features
- Maker fee at 0% since February 2026
- Four chains in one trading interface
- Yield-bearing collateral
- CEX-grade order-book experience
- Largest perpetual DEX by trading volume
- Purpose-built layer 1 rather than a rollup dependency
- Fee discount through HYPE staking
- TWAP orders available to retail users
Details
AsterHyperliquid
| Aster (merger of Astherus & APX Finance) | Company | Hyperliquid Labs |
| Seychelles | Headquarters | United States |