Aster vs dYdX Comparison
| 0% maker / 0.04% taker (USDT perps) | Fees | 0.05% taker / 0.01% maker |
AsterWinner
vs
dYdX
Pros & Cons
Pros
- 0% maker fee on perpetuals
- Four chains — BNB Chain, Ethereum, Solana and Arbitrum — from one interface
- Collateral can keep earning yield while positions stay open
- Non-custodial with on-chain settlement
- No KYC for on-chain trading
Cons
- No EU authorisation
- 1001x leverage marketing sets an unrealistic anchor
- Liquidity thinner than the volume leaders in smaller markets
- Tax reporting rests entirely with the user
Pros
- Fully decentralised order book — matching runs through validators
- Purpose-built Cosmos chain rather than a rollup dependency
- Long operating history and mature market structure
- 200+ markets
- Low network fees
Cons
- Market share has fallen sharply as liquidity moved to newer venues
- Thinner books and higher slippage in secondary markets
- No EU authorisation
- Support runs through community channels
Score Comparison
4.6Usability4.2
4.7Features4.2
4.8Fees4.2
4.3Stability4.5
3.6Support3.6
Features
- Maker fee at 0% since February 2026
- Four chains in one trading interface
- Yield-bearing collateral
- CEX-grade order-book experience
- Decentralised matching at validator level
- Purpose-built Cosmos chain
- Established name in derivatives
- 200+ perpetual markets
Details
AsterdYdX
| Aster (merger of Astherus & APX Finance) | Company | dYdX Trading Inc. |
| Seychelles | Headquarters | United States |