ApeX Protocol vs Jupiter Comparison
| 0.02% maker / 0.05% taker | Fees | 4-7 bps position open/close |
ApeX Protocol
vs
JupiterWinner
Pros & Cons
Pros
- No gas costs for users
- Perpetuals on equities, commodities and prediction markets too
- Around 90 crypto perpetuals, up to 100x leverage on BTC and ETH
- Operating since 2022 with no known loss of user funds
- Well-known backers
Cons
- Considerably lower volume than the market leaders
- Thinner order books in secondary markets
- No EU authorisation
- Support runs through community channels
Pros
- Near-zero network fees on Solana
- Very fast execution
- Embedded in Solana's largest trading ecosystem
- Pool model without order-book slippage
- Liquidity provision through JLP with a share of fees
Cons
- Narrow market list — essentially the major pairs
- Funding costs on open positions
- Very high leverage tiers on individual pairs raise liquidation risk
- No EU authorisation
Score Comparison
4.4Usability4.6
4.1Features3.9
4.3Fees4.0
4.2Stability4.3
3.5Support3.5
Features
- No gas costs
- Crypto, equity and commodity perpetuals in one interface
- Operating since 2022 without a known security incident
- Up to 100x leverage on the main markets
- Network fees at a fraction of a cent
- JLP pool at billion-dollar scale
- Part of the Solana trading ecosystem
- Fee share for liquidity providers
Details
ApeX ProtocolJupiter
| ApeX Protocol (by Bybit) | Company | Jupiter Exchange |
| Singapore | Headquarters | Singapore |