ApeX Protocol vs Aster Comparison
| 0.02% maker / 0.05% taker | Fees | 0% maker / 0.04% taker (USDT perps) |
ApeX Protocol
vs
AsterWinner
Pros & Cons
Pros
- No gas costs for users
- Perpetuals on equities, commodities and prediction markets too
- Around 90 crypto perpetuals, up to 100x leverage on BTC and ETH
- Operating since 2022 with no known loss of user funds
- Well-known backers
Cons
- Considerably lower volume than the market leaders
- Thinner order books in secondary markets
- No EU authorisation
- Support runs through community channels
Pros
- 0% maker fee on perpetuals
- Four chains — BNB Chain, Ethereum, Solana and Arbitrum — from one interface
- Collateral can keep earning yield while positions stay open
- Non-custodial with on-chain settlement
- No KYC for on-chain trading
Cons
- No EU authorisation
- 1001x leverage marketing sets an unrealistic anchor
- Liquidity thinner than the volume leaders in smaller markets
- Tax reporting rests entirely with the user
Score Comparison
4.4Usability4.6
4.1Features4.7
4.3Fees4.8
4.2Stability4.3
3.5Support3.6
Features
- No gas costs
- Crypto, equity and commodity perpetuals in one interface
- Operating since 2022 without a known security incident
- Up to 100x leverage on the main markets
- Maker fee at 0% since February 2026
- Four chains in one trading interface
- Yield-bearing collateral
- CEX-grade order-book experience
Details
ApeX ProtocolAster
| ApeX Protocol (by Bybit) | Company | Aster (merger of Astherus & APX Finance) |
| Singapore | Headquarters | Seychelles |