Extended vs Vertex Protocol Comparison
| 0% maker / 0.025% taker | Fees | 0.02% maker / 0.05% taker |
ExtendedWinner
vs
Vertex Protocol
Pros & Cons
Pros
- 0% maker fee, 0.025% taker
- Daily maker rebates based on maker share
- Very low network fees on Starknet
- Unified margin across several asset classes
- Self-custody
Cons
- Considerably smaller than the market leaders
- Around 50 trading pairs — a narrower list than competitors
- No EU authorisation
- Support runs through community channels
Pros
- Cross-margin across spot and perpetual positions
- Competitive fees of roughly 0.02% maker / 0.05% taker
- Migration onto a Kraken-incubated layer 2
- Product direction retained according to the provider
Cons
- Existing network deployments are being deprecated
- The VRTX token is being wound down
- Migration not complete at the time of review
- Considerably lower liquidity than the market leaders
- No EU authorisation
Score Comparison
4.3Usability3.9
4.3Features3.6
4.8Fees4.0
4.2Stability3.0
3.7Support3.2
Features
- Fee-free on the maker side
- Team with Revolut roots
- Cross-asset collateral and unified margin
- Network costs in the cents range
- Rebuild onto the Ink layer 2 underway
- Cross-margin model
- Existing EVM deployments deprecated
- Token wind-down announced
Details
ExtendedVertex Protocol
| Extended Finance | Company | Vertex Protocol |
| Unknown (Decentralised team) | Headquarters | USA |