Aster vs Vertex Protocol Comparison
| 0% maker / 0.04% taker (USDT perps) | Fees | 0.02% maker / 0.05% taker |
AsterWinner
vs
Vertex Protocol
Pros & Cons
Pros
- 0% maker fee on perpetuals
- Four chains — BNB Chain, Ethereum, Solana and Arbitrum — from one interface
- Collateral can keep earning yield while positions stay open
- Non-custodial with on-chain settlement
- No KYC for on-chain trading
Cons
- No EU authorisation
- 1001x leverage marketing sets an unrealistic anchor
- Liquidity thinner than the volume leaders in smaller markets
- Tax reporting rests entirely with the user
Pros
- Cross-margin across spot and perpetual positions
- Competitive fees of roughly 0.02% maker / 0.05% taker
- Migration onto a Kraken-incubated layer 2
- Product direction retained according to the provider
Cons
- Existing network deployments are being deprecated
- The VRTX token is being wound down
- Migration not complete at the time of review
- Considerably lower liquidity than the market leaders
- No EU authorisation
Score Comparison
4.6Usability3.9
4.7Features3.6
4.8Fees4.0
4.3Stability3.0
3.6Support3.2
Features
- Maker fee at 0% since February 2026
- Four chains in one trading interface
- Yield-bearing collateral
- CEX-grade order-book experience
- Rebuild onto the Ink layer 2 underway
- Cross-margin model
- Existing EVM deployments deprecated
- Token wind-down announced
Details
AsterVertex Protocol
| Aster (merger of Astherus & APX Finance) | Company | Vertex Protocol |
| Seychelles | Headquarters | USA |