Aster vs Vertex Protocol Comparison
| 0% maker / 0.04% taker (USDT perps) | Fees | 0.02% maker / 0.05% taker |
Cost comparison
The basis is a Bitcoin purchase worth €1,000, including all fees and spreads.
| 0% maker / 0.04% taker (USDT perps) | Fees | 0.02% maker / 0.05% taker |
Pros & Cons
- 0% maker fee on perpetuals
- Four chains — BNB Chain, Ethereum, Solana and Arbitrum — from one interface
- Collateral can keep earning yield while positions stay open
- Non-custodial with on-chain settlement
- No KYC for on-chain trading
- No EU authorisation
- 1001x leverage marketing sets an unrealistic anchor
- Liquidity thinner than the volume leaders in smaller markets
- Tax reporting rests entirely with the user
- Cross-margin across spot and perpetual positions
- Competitive fees of roughly 0.02% maker / 0.05% taker
- Migration onto a Kraken-incubated layer 2
- Product direction retained according to the provider
- Existing network deployments are being deprecated
- The VRTX token is being wound down
- Migration not complete at the time of review
- Considerably lower liquidity than the market leaders
- No EU authorisation
Score Comparison
Features
- Maker fee at 0% since February 2026
- Four chains in one trading interface
- Yield-bearing collateral
- CEX-grade order-book experience
- Rebuild onto the Ink layer 2 underway
- Cross-margin model
- Existing EVM deployments deprecated
- Token wind-down announced
The five areas head to head
AI AnalysisFees & Costs
Since February 2026 no maker fees apply on perpetual contracts; takers pay 0.04% on USDT-margined perpetuals and considerably less on USD1 perpetuals. Perpetuals on tokenised equities carry no trading fee. Network fees of the chain in use apply on top and vary by chain. As of August 2026.
Fees most recently ran at roughly 0.02% for makers and 0.05% for takers. Reliable figures for the period after the move to the new layer 2 are not available at the time of review, so terms should be checked immediately before trading. As of August 2026.
Usability & User Experience
The interface follows centralised exchange conventions and is quick to navigate for anyone with futures experience. Access is by wallet connection without registration. Traders using several chains need to watch collateral and gas conditions on each. As of August 2026.
The interface targeted experienced users and assumed knowledge of margin and funding. Given the rebuild underway, users should focus above all on the migration status and the deadlines applying to existing positions. As of August 2026.
Features & Offering
Aster combines perpetuals on cryptocurrencies with perpetuals on tokenised equities and metals. Alongside market, limit, stop-loss and take-profit orders it offers hidden orders and grid trading. A distinguishing feature is yield-bearing collateral: posted capital can continue to earn while a position stays open. As of August 2026.
The defining feature was a cross-margin model in which spot and perpetual positions share collateral. The feature set after the migration to Ink is not conclusively documented at the time of review. The existing deployments on Arbitrum and further chains are deprecated. As of August 2026.
Details
| Aster (merger of Astherus & APX Finance) | Company | Vertex Protocol |
| Seychelles | Headquarters | USA |
Verdict
In our overall rating Aster leads with 4.7 against 3.0 for Vertex Protocol.
For most investors Aster is therefore the better choice.
Aster emerged from the merger of Astherus and APX Finance and positions itself as the multi-chain alternative to single-chain perpetual DEXs. Trading spans BNB Chain, Ethereum, Solana and Arbitrum, settlement stays on-chain and custody stays with the user.
On pricing, Aster moved in February 2026: makers pay 0% on perpetuals, takers 0.04% on USDT-margined perpetuals, and perpetuals on tokenised equities carry no trading fee at all. Collateral posted in certain forms continues to earn yield while a position is open.
The advertised 1001x leverage is mainly a marketing signal and is barely usable in practice — liquidation thresholds at that level are extremely tight. The platform holds no EU authorisation; perpetuals sit outside MiCA in any case, and tax reporting rests entirely with the user. Aster is worth a look for experienced traders who want several chains from one interface.
More important than any fee detail is the rebuild underway at Vertex: the existing EVM deployments — Arbitrum, Mantle, Sei, Base and Sonic among them — are being deprecated. The exchange is being rebuilt on Ink, an Ethereum layer 2 incubated by Kraken on the OP Stack. In parallel, the VRTX token is being wound down.
The product itself is meant to survive, according to the team — what changes is the technical substrate, not the direction. Vertex was valued for its cross-margin model, in which spot and perpetual positions share collateral, and for fees of roughly 0.02% maker and 0.05% taker.
For users the practical implication is clear: anyone holding capital or running positions here needs to follow the migration plan actively, because the existing deployments and the token are not permanent. Until the move is complete and proven in operation, Vertex is not a candidate for a fresh start — quite apart from the absence of EU authorisation.