Staking Pools: Opportunities and Risks

In the cryptocurrency world, there is a powerful drive to grow from the energy-consuming proof of work consensus mechanism to proof of stake. Proof of stake networks typically improve the likelihood of creating a block and thus scraping the transaction […]

Prasanna Peshkar

Prasanna Peshkar

March 11, 2019 11:08 AM

Staking Pools: Opportunities and Risks

In the cryptocurrency world, there is a powerful drive to grow from the energy-consuming proof of work consensus mechanism to proof of stake. Proof of stake networks typically improve the likelihood of creating a block and thus scraping the transaction fees, with the number of coins a member has. Similar to Proof of Work’s mining pools, Proof of Stake has the idea of staking pools. Stakeholders unite and split the reward.

Proof of work is the first and currently most popular consensus algorithm for blockchain applications. In this algorithm, every node attempts to resolve complicated mathematical problems and in return, the node which solves the problem gets cryptocurrencies. The major part of the problem is confirming the transaction. Another property is the asymmetric nature of the problem. It is difficult for the nodes to solve but easy enough for the network to verify. Proof of work is a brute force algorithm and the node with the most computing power has the chance of getting more reward.

In proof of stake, unlike in proof of work, a node is chosen to validate the transaction from a preset list of trusted nodes, each node has to stake a definite amount of cryptocurrency in order to be qualified to get into the list. So what stops the selected trusted node from doing malicious activities? If a node is found out to be cheating the money at stake is taken as fine hence there is an economic incentive not to cheat. The procedure to verify the transaction is similar to the proof of work, but there is no competition among nodes to solve the problem. This lack of competition reduces power consumption greatly.

The benefits of staking pools

Proof-of-Stake (PoS) grants an added energy-efficient option to Proof-of-Work (PoW). Depending on how a scheme outlines the rules of its blockchain, PoS can also be extra decentralized. A PoS arrangement substitutes the complicated computations of a PoW method with much uncomplicated — possession of the blockchain’s token.

In a PoS rule, the stakeholder must invariably be online if he/she wants to produce a block. In this, a continually hanging on the network computer can cause power consumption and the risk of hacker attacks. The staking pool reduces these disadvantages. It ensures that the foundation is well controlled and the production of the blocks is flawlessly secured. The Coinholder does not have to worry about anything.

The selection method which produced the block is random. Each PoS blockchain has a distinctive method of choosing which stakeholder has the power to process transactions and win mining premia. The easiest method is an arbitrary determination from the pool of members.

Disadvantages

A staking pool is a primary case that demands to be trusted. One has limited insight on how reliable and acknowledged the company trades with the stake. The threat of hacking attacks and linked total damages is ubiquitous. The area is still little monitored. No one knows how to handle staking pools in the future. How are they income taxed? What is the obligation of the pool operator to the participating stakeholders?

Types of staking pools

There are two varieties of staking pools. Embedded, ie directly combined into the project which usually supports only the native token and are decentralized and multi blockchain staking pools, which are normally administered by central authorities and where the stake must be given out of hand.

Multiblockchain Staking Pools

These services allow people to participate in pools for several small market cap PoS blockchain plans. There are normally two varieties of pooling possibilities: People can join a proof-of-stake pool or they can provide stake to a masternode. These are blockchain distinct and depend on how specific project structures its PoS system.

Stakinglab

This company is located in Germany. It is posted directly in contact with the projects for which one forms the pools. There are now 74 projects supported by Stakinglab. The company collects a 3% charge on the created block reward. If you want to withdraw your stake, a markup of 0.1% is added.

SimplePoSPool

This project claims to be fully automated. Currently, there are 20 Stakingpools and 48 Masternode Pools. A master-modepool is a pool whose resources are utilized for the formation of Masternodes. As a rule, every masternode has to lock a certain number of coins in order to qualify. Masternodes also receive rewards, which are then shared in case of a pool. SimplePoSPool charges a service fee of 5% on all generated revenue.

Disclaimer: This information should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any cryptocurrency. It is not a recommendation to trade. The crypto market is full of surprises and overhyped assets. Do your research before buying anything. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Follow us on TwitterFacebookSteemit, and join our Telegram channel for the latest blockchain and cryptocurrency news


Prasanna Peshkar
Article By

Prasanna Peshkar

Prasanna Peshkar is a seasoned writer and analyst specializing in cryptocurrency and blockchain technology. With a focus on delivering insightful commentary and analysis, Prasanna serves as a writer and analyst at CryptoTicker, assisting readers in navigating the complexities of the cryptocurrency market.

More articles on Cryptoticker

View All

Regular updates on Web3, NFTs, Bitcoin & Price forecasts.

Stay up to date with CryptoTicker.