The long held argument against cryptocurrencies whereby terrorists could use them as a source of illicit money laundering and weapon financing has been further weakened by recent statements and reports made my various officials and investigators around the world. The Congress was reported today at a House Financial Services Commercial hearing that several well-known criminal organizations such as ISIS (The Islamic State), Al Qaeda, etc have failed repeatedly in raising money for terrorism and support through cryptocurrencies, which are powered by their underlying blockchain technology.
Updates from the House Financial Services Commercial hearing
Yaya Fanusie, director of analysis for the Foundation For Defense of Democracies Center on Sanctions and Illicit Finance strongly asserted that “cold hard cash is still king” while explaining his overarching point about cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Monero being unfeasible and unsuccessful for such International terrorist organizations, as reported by Forbes.
Fanusie further gave a recent example of a terrorist organization called the Mujahideen Shura Council (MSC) based in the Environs of Jerusalem that had only managed to raise a meagre $500 in a few weeks of their 2016 online campaign through cryptocurrencies with just 2 contributions. His statements against the prospect of future terrorist financing through cryptocurrencies were based on the following drawbacks of using cryptocurrencies in their context.
Lack of local cryptocurrency adoption
Cryptocurrencies are still in their early adoption phases with only a few countries like the United States, Japan, Turkey, and South Korea having a relatively established crypto ecosystem where cryptocurrencies can be legally exchanged in fiat to crypto exchanges, and be used to buy a limited amount of goods and services.
However, most countries where terrorism is rampant tend to be developing nations with little or no cryptocurrency adoption. Such terrorist organizations would have no ways of converting cryptocurrencies into fiat currencies that would then be used to fund their terrorism activities. Moreover, cryptocurrencies can also not be directly used to purchase goods and assets from their suppliers and this poses a widespread problem for them.
Sub-par Technology Infrastructure
Several terrorist organizations have only recently started using various social media tools like Facebook and Whatsapp to assist them in their international recruiting campaigns. However, Fanusie mentioned in the House Financial Services Commercial hearing that these terrorist organizations tend to have “unreliable technology infrastructure” and this is again because of factors such as constant movement of resources and the lack of a stable internet service within such terrorist regions. Terrorist organizations such as the Islamic State (ISIS) tend to constantly move their troops in hiding and this restricts their access to resources such as a stable internet connection and hardware required for the trading of such cryptocurrencies.
Smaller, unregulated exchanges pose a threat for the future of terrorist-financed cryptocurrencies
Yet, Fanusie cautioned that smaller, unregulated exchanges tend to have more lenient rules regarding legal compliance and anti-money laundering which could pose a greater threat to potential future threats of terrorist crypto financing. This especially applies to a variety of privacy coins such as Monero, ZCash, Dash, Enigma, etc whereby both parties within transactions tend to be completely anonymous and untraceable. Hence, it would be interesting to see how global crypto regulation responds to the presence of such smaller exchanges where proper KYC (Know Your Customer) and Anti Money Laundering (AML) rules are not in place.
“By preparing now for terrorists’ increasing usage of cryptocurrencies, the U.S. can limit the ability to turn digital currency markets into a sanctuary for illicit finance,” Fanusie chimed amidst the House FSC hearing.
These trends and factors seem to point towards the comforting fact that cryptocurrencies would not harbor and be a useful tool for global terrorist organizations to raise illegal funds for their propaganda. However, regulatory boards around the globe would need to step up their rules targeting specific platforms like unregulated smaller exchanges in their global fight against the spread of terrorism.
The views mentioned within this article have been compiled from sources listed on the web and do not represent the views of Cryptoticker.io and/or its subsidiaries.
Trading Bitcoin is too complicated?
We highly recommend our Crypto-Starter-Kit to you!
Follow us on Social Media and subscribe to our free crypto newsletter!
Diskutiere mit uns!
This post may contain promotional links that help us fund the site. When you click on the links, we receive a commission - but the prices do not change for you! :)
Disclaimer: The authors of this website may have invested in crypto currencies themselves. They are not financial advisors and only express their opinions. Anyone considering investing in crypto currencies should be well informed about these high-risk assets.
Trading with financial products, especially with CFDs involves a high level of risk and is therefore not suitable for security-conscious investors. CFDs are complex instruments and carry a high risk of losing money quickly through leverage. Be aware that most private Investors lose money, if they decide to trade CFDs. Any type of trading and speculation in financial products that can produce an unusually high return is also associated with increased risk to lose money. Note that past gains are no guarantee of positive results in the future.
You might also like
More from Regulation
On February 9th, 2021, Don Tapscott, author, businessman, and leader of the Blockchain Research Institute, published a 120-page comprehensive report …
As Trump finally concedes to Biden’s presidential win, Biden begins to enact his policies and nominate the future leaders of …