NEO, ehemals ANT-Shares, ist eine Smart Contract Plattform aus China. Sie war der erste größere Konkurrent von Ethereum, musste aber inzwischen vielen anderen Konkurrenten Platz machen. NEO hat im Laufe seiner Entwicklungen massive Änderungen am Protokoll vorgenommen, um konkurrenzfähig zu bleiben. Letztes Jahr wurde NEO 3.0 veröffentlicht. Eine Besonderheit von NEO ist die Trennung zwischen dem nativen Token und Gas.
Neo kurz erklärt
NEO Newsticker
06.01.2019: Update für NEO steht bevor
Token Burn Rate Calculation:
- Past 24 Hours: 26,572,022 / 24 hours = 1,107,168 tokens burned per hour
- Past 7 Days: 434,925,917 / 168 hours (7 days) = 2,589,814 tokens burned per hour
A significant decrease in the token burn rate, as observed in the case of Shiba Inu or any other cryptocurrency, can be attributed to several factors:
- Community Decisions: The rate at which tokens are burned is often determined by the cryptocurrency’s community or developers. If there’s a change in sentiment within the community or a shift in the project’s goals, it could lead to a reduction in the burning of tokens.
- Economic Considerations: Cryptocurrency projects might adjust their tokenomics to align with their long-term goals. This could involve reducing the rate of token burning to ensure a more sustainable ecosystem, especially if the burn rate was initially high.
- Market Conditions: Cryptocurrency prices and market conditions can influence token burn rates. A bear market or a period of low trading activity may reduce the number of tokens burned, as there might be fewer transactions to facilitate the burns.
- Regulatory Changes: Regulatory developments can impact token burning. If there are legal concerns or regulatory pressures related to token burning, a project might choose to slow down or halt the practice to avoid legal complications.
- Technical Constraints: Sometimes, technical issues or constraints can affect token burns. Network congestion, high gas fees (in the case of Ethereum-based tokens), or issues with smart contracts can slow down the process.
- Strategic Adjustments: Cryptocurrency projects often evolve and adapt their strategies over time. They may choose to allocate tokens differently, such as for marketing, partnerships, or development, rather than burning them.
- Community Feedback: Feedback from the community can also influence token burn decisions. If a project’s supporters or users voice concerns about the high burn rate affecting liquidity or utility, the project may respond by reducing the rate.
- Competitive Landscape: Changes in the competitive landscape can lead to adjustments in token burn rates. If other projects in the same space are not burning tokens as aggressively, a project may follow suit to remain competitive.
- Market Sentiment: Market sentiment and investor behavior play a crucial role. If investors are holding tokens rather than using them for transactions or burns, it can lead to a decrease in the burn rate.
- Financial Sustainability: Cryptocurrency projects need to ensure their financial sustainability. If a high burn rate threatens the project’s ability to cover expenses or invest in development, the rate may be reduced.